SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2022
Use of Robots in Critical Care: Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of collaborative robots for nurses: where are we now, and where is the evidence?Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy of suspension-based lower-limb rehabilitation device in enhancing lower limb function among patients with ICU-acquired weakness: a self-controlled randomized clinical trial.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Trial
- Evaluating Nursing Work Systems and Identifying Barriers for Robotic Technology Integration: Observational Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Observational
- Artificial Intelligence with Robotics for Metabolic Rehabilitation and Enhanced Patient Recovery in Critical Care.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Article
- Health Care Social Robots in the Age of Generative AI: Protocol for a Scoping Review.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Evaluation of nurses' perspectives on the design and use of assistant nurse robots in obstetrics and neonatal care: a mixed-method study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Clinicians' Perceptions and Potential Applications of Robotics for Task Automation in Critical Care: Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Assistive technologies in healthcare: utilization and healthcare workers perceptions in Germany.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Responsible and adaptive robots in care home settings: an implementation framework analysis of a workshop with public and professionals.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2025Article
- Transformer-based human-motion forecasting coupled with safe reinforcement learning for telepresence robot co-navigation.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2025Article
- Care Beyond Cure: Humanizing the Intensive Care Unit Journey.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024Article
- Review
- Advances in the Application of AI Robots in Critical Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Satisfaction analysis of 5G remote ultrasound robot for diagnostics based on a structural equation model.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2024Article
- Human resource management (HRM) strategies of medical staff during the COVID-19 pandemic.Heliyon · 2023Review
- Improving environmental sustainability of intensive care units: A mini-review.World journal of critical care medicine · 2023Review
- Focusing on experts: Expectations of healthcare professionals regarding the use of telemedicine in intensive care units.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe recent focus on the critical setting, especially with the COVID-19 pandemic, has highlighted the need for minimizing contact-based care and increasing robotic use. Robotics is a rising field in the context of health care, and we sought to evaluate the use of robots in critical care settings.
objectiveAlthough robotic presence is prevalent in the surgical setting, its role in critical care has not been well established. We aimed to examine the uses and limitations of robots for patients who are critically ill.
methodsThis systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. MEDLINE, Embase, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Library were searched from their inception to December 23, 2021. Included studies involved patients requiring critical care, both in intensive care units or high-dependency units, or settings that required critical care procedures (eg, intubation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation). Randomized trials and observational studies were included.
resultsA total of 33 studies were included. The greatest application of robots in the intensive care unit was in the field of telepresence, whereby robots proved advantageous in providing a reduced response time, earlier intervention, and lower mortality rates. Challenges of telepresence included regulatory and financial barriers. In therapy and stroke rehabilitation, robots achieved superior clinical outcomes safely. Robotic use in patient evaluation and assessment was mainly through ultrasound evaluation, obtaining satisfactory to superior results with the added benefits of remote assessment, time savings, and increased efficiency. Robots in drug dispensing and delivery increased efficiency and generated cost savings. All the robots had technological limitations and hidden costs.
conclusionsOverall, our results show that robotic use in critical care settings is a beneficial, effective, and well-received intervention that delivers significant benefits to patients, staff, and hospitals. Looking ahead, it is necessary to form strong ethical and legislative frameworks and overcome various regulatory and financial barriers.
trial registrationPROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42021234162; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=234162.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.