Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35576107›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of older people nursing2022

Visual identifier systems for patients with cognitive impairment in healthcare settings: A survey of practice in UK hospitals.

Karolina Kuberska, Mary Dixon-Woods, Graham Martin, DA VINCI Contributor Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of older people nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. A Patient and Public Engagement Project to Inform Dementia Care in a UK Hospital Trust.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Understanding the cultural environment of the outpatient care setting for patients with dementia receiving cancer treatment: A qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karolina KuberskaTHIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Clifford Allbutt Building, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9610-1863
Mary Dixon-WoodsTHIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Clifford Allbutt Building, Cambridge, UK.
Graham MartinTHIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Clifford Allbutt Building, Cambridge, UK.
DA VINCI Contributor Group

Funding

Chief Scientist Office HSRU2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with dementia and other forms of cognitive impairment form a substantial proportion of patients admitted to hospitals, but problems in their care are persistent. One widely proposed improvement approach involves the use of systems using visual identifiers to help staff quickly recognise people with suspected dementia, with the goal of supporting more personalised care. The aim of this paper is to identify the identifier systems in use and staff perceptions of their strengths and weaknesses.

methodsWe undertook an online survey of staff providing care for people with dementia in acute and mental health hospitals across the United Kingdom. The questionnaire covered different types of visual identifier systems for dementia. It used categorical and open-response questions to access staff views of their use in practice. Responses were analysed using descriptive statistics, and the Framework approach for free-text answers.

results162 responses were received from staff in at least 48 hospitals. Of these, 128 had direct experience of using visual identifier systems. They reported that multiple identifier systems are in use, including schemes with national scope and locally developed approaches. Most respondents reported that more than one system is in use in their hospital. Different types of identifier were seen to have different strengths and weaknesses. Respondents had a broadly positive view of identifiers, but highlighted risks including lack of reliable and consistent use (linked to competing pressures on staff time), lack of staff training, uncertainty about patient and family views, and unclear consent processes.

conclusionsOur study suggests that a wide range of identifier systems is in use in UK hospitals, with many hospitals using more than one. Further consideration should be given to ensuring that multiple perspectives-including those of patients and carers-are drawn on in optimising their design, resolving ethical issues and supporting implementation.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionDementiaDelivery of Health CareHospitalsHumansSurveys and Questionnairescognitive impairmentdementiahospital careidentificationpatient careperson-centred caresurvey

Identifiers

PMID35576107
PMCPMC9786885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.