Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35576007›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Performance of a Machine Learning Algorithm Using Electronic Health Record Data to Predict Postoperative Complications and Report on a Mobile Platform.

Yuanfang Ren, Tyler J Loftus, Shounak Datta, Matthew M Ruppert, Ziyuan Guan, Shunshun Miao, Benjamin Shickel, Zheng Feng, Chris Giordano, Gilbert R Upchurch and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Time-sequential prediction of postoperative complications after gastric cancer surgery using machine learning: a multicenter cohort study.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yuanfang RenIntelligent Critical Care Center, University of Florida, Gainesville.
Tyler J LoftusIntelligent Critical Care Center, University of Florida, Gainesville.
Shounak DattaIntelligent Critical Care Center, University of Florida, Gainesville.
Matthew M RuppertIntelligent Critical Care Center, University of Florida, Gainesville.
Ziyuan GuanIntelligent Critical Care Center, University of Florida, Gainesville.
Shunshun MiaoIntelligent Critical Care Center, University of Florida, Gainesville.
Benjamin ShickelIntelligent Critical Care Center, University of Florida, Gainesville.
Zheng FengIntelligent Critical Care Center, University of Florida, Gainesville.
Chris GiordanoIntelligent Critical Care Center, University of Florida, Gainesville.
Gilbert R UpchurchIntelligent Critical Care Center, University of Florida, Gainesville.
Parisa RashidiIntelligent Critical Care Center, University of Florida, Gainesville.
Tezcan Ozrazgat-BaslantiIntelligent Critical Care Center, University of Florida, Gainesville.
Azra BihoracIntelligent Critical Care Center, University of Florida, Gainesville.

Funding

Using social networks to map and evaluate team science across CTSA hubsUL1TR001427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MITCHELL, DUANE A. · 2015 to 2024
$37.2M
UF Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000064 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI NELSON, DAVID R · 2012 to 2014
$12.2M
Integrating data, algorithms and clinical reasoning for surgical risk assessmentR01GM110240 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BIHORAC, AZRA, RASHIDI, PARISA · 2016 to 2025
$5.1M
(MEnD-AKI) Multicenter Implementation of an Electronic Decision Support System for Drug-associated AKIR01DK121730 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BIHORAC, AZRA, KANE-GILL, SANDRA L · 2021 to 2025
$3.2M
ADAPT: Autonomous Delirium Monitoring and Adaptive PreventionR01NS120924 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BIHORAC, AZRA, RASHIDI, PARISA · 2021 to 2025
$2.9M
Intelligent Intensive Care Unit (I2CU): Pervasive Sensing and Artificial Intelligence for Augmented Clinical Decision-makingR01EB029699 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BIHORAC, AZRA, RASHIDI, PARISA · 2021 to 2024
$2.4M
The circadian clock protein BMAL and post-translational regulation of ENaC in the kidneyR01DK123078 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI ALLI, ABDEL AYUBE · 2020 to 2024
$1.7M
Aligning Patient Acuity with Intensity of Care after SurgeryK23GM140268 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI LOFTUS, TYLER J · 2020 to 2023
$619k
Autonomous Pain Recognition in Non-Verbal and Critically Ill PatientsR21EB027344 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI RASHIDI, PARISA · 2019 to 2022
$577k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000064NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001427NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB029699NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB027344NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK121730NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK123078NIGMS NIH HHS K23 GM140268NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM110240NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS120924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Predicting postoperative complications has the potential to inform shared decisions regarding the appropriateness of surgical procedures, targeted risk-reduction strategies, and postoperative resource use. Realizing these advantages requires that accurate real-time predictions be integrated with clinical and digital workflows; artificial intelligence predictive analytic platforms using automated electronic health record (EHR) data inputs offer an intriguing possibility for achieving this, but there is a lack of high-level evidence from prospective studies supporting their use. Objective: To examine whether the MySurgeryRisk artificial intelligence system has stable predictive performance between development and prospective validation phases and whether it is feasible to provide automated outputs directly to surgeons' mobile devices. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this prognostic study, the platform used automated EHR data inputs and machine learning algorithms to predict postoperative complications and provide predictions to surgeons, previously through a web portal and currently through a mobile device application. All patients 18 years or older who were admitted for any type of inpatient surgical procedure (74 417 total procedures involving 58 236 patients) between June 1, 2014, and September 20, 2020, were included. Models were developed using retrospective data from 52 117 inpatient surgical procedures performed between June 1, 2014, and November 27, 2018. Validation was performed using data from 22 300 inpatient surgical procedures collected prospectively from November 28, 2018, to September 20, 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: Algorithms for generalized additive models and random forest models were developed and validated using real-time EHR data. Model predictive performance was evaluated primarily using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) values. Results: Among 58 236 total adult patients who received 74 417 major inpatient surgical procedures, the mean (SD) age was 57 (17) years; 29 226 patients (50.2%) were male. Results reported in this article focus primarily on the validation cohort. The validation cohort included 22 300 inpatient surgical procedures involving 19 132 patients (mean [SD] age, 58 [17] years; 9672 [50.6%] male). A total of 2765 patients (14.5%) were Black or African American, 14 777 (77.2%) were White, 1235 (6.5%) were of other races (including American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, and multiracial), and 355 (1.9%) were of unknown race because of missing data; 979 patients (5.1%) were Hispanic, 17 663 (92.3%) were non-Hispanic, and 490 (2.6%) were of unknown ethnicity because of missing data. A greater number of input features was associated with stable or improved model performance. For example, the random forest model trained with 135 input features had the highest AUROC values for predicting acute kidney injury (0.82; 95% CI, 0.82-0.83); cardiovascular complications (0.81; 95% CI, 0.81-0.82); neurological complications, including delirium (0.87; 95% CI, 0.87-0.88); prolonged intensive care unit stay (0.89; 95% CI, 0.88-0.89); prolonged mechanical ventilation (0.91; 95% CI, 0.90-0.91); sepsis (0.86; 95% CI, 0.85-0.87); venous thromboembolism (0.82; 95% CI, 0.81-0.83); wound complications (0.78; 95% CI, 0.78-0.79); 30-day mortality (0.84; 95% CI, 0.82-0.86); and 90-day mortality (0.84; 95% CI, 0.82-0.85), with accuracy similar to surgeons' predictions. Compared with the original web portal, the mobile device application allowed efficient fingerprint login access and loaded data approximately 10 times faster. The application output displayed patient information, risk of postoperative complications, top 3 risk factors for each complication, and patterns of complications for individual surgeons compared with their colleagues. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, automated real-time predictions of postoperative complications with mobile device outputs had good performance in clinical settings with prospective validation, matching surgeons' predictive accuracy.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceElectronic Health RecordsAdultAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35576007
PMCPMC9112066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.