ArticleJAMA network open2022
Performance of a Machine Learning Algorithm Using Electronic Health Record Data to Predict Postoperative Complications and Report on a Mobile Platform.
Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
63 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence for venous thromboembolism risk stratification in surgical patients: a systematic review.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Pooled it
- Effect of machine learning models on clinician prediction of postoperative complications: the Perioperative ORACLE randomised clinical trial.British journal of anaesthesia · 2024Trial
- Integrating artificial intelligence into venous thromboembolism care: Predictive models, implementation challenges, and future directions.Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders · 2026Article
- Adding Artificial Intelligence to the Surgeon's Domain.World journal of surgery · 2026Review
- Improving Delirium Prediction in Surgery: Enhanced Machine Learning Models vs. Traditional Risk Scores.Journal of Korean medical science · 2026Article
- Article
- End-of-surgery prediction of postoperative infectious complications from intraoperative vital-sign dynamics.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- A Holistic Nursing Surveillance Decision Support System for Postoperative Pulmonary Complications After Abdominal Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Risk prediction in spine surgery: a scoping review of traditional models, artificial intelligence, and the challenge of clinical translation.Spine deformity · 2026Review
- The cyber-physical paradigm for lifetime aortic valve management: a synthesis of robotics, artificial intelligence, and augmented reality.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Review
- Interpretable AI-driven prediction of early postoperative recurrence in locally advanced rectal cancer using the Systemic Inflammatory-Nutritional Index (SINTI): A multi-center study and clinical web tool.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026Article
- Prediction of Pathological Complete Response after Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Using Machine Learning with Clinical Features, the INTERCEPTOR Study Preliminary Model.Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a clinical prediction model for postoperative atrial fibrillation after lung cancer surgery: a machine-learning-based study.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Progress in sepsis prediction models: from traditional scoring systems to multimodal intelligence and clinical translation.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Predicting postoperative complications after pneumonectomy using machine learning: a 10-year study.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- Clinical implementation of an AI-based prediction model for decision support for patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery.Nature medicine · 2025Article
- Time-sequential prediction of postoperative complications after gastric cancer surgery using machine learning: a multicenter cohort study.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2025Article
- Real-world evaluation of user engagement with an artificial intelligence-powered clinical trial application in oncology.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Article
3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Predicting postoperative complications has the potential to inform shared decisions regarding the appropriateness of surgical procedures, targeted risk-reduction strategies, and postoperative resource use. Realizing these advantages requires that accurate real-time predictions be integrated with clinical and digital workflows; artificial intelligence predictive analytic platforms using automated electronic health record (EHR) data inputs offer an intriguing possibility for achieving this, but there is a lack of high-level evidence from prospective studies supporting their use. Objective: To examine whether the MySurgeryRisk artificial intelligence system has stable predictive performance between development and prospective validation phases and whether it is feasible to provide automated outputs directly to surgeons' mobile devices. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this prognostic study, the platform used automated EHR data inputs and machine learning algorithms to predict postoperative complications and provide predictions to surgeons, previously through a web portal and currently through a mobile device application. All patients 18 years or older who were admitted for any type of inpatient surgical procedure (74 417 total procedures involving 58 236 patients) between June 1, 2014, and September 20, 2020, were included. Models were developed using retrospective data from 52 117 inpatient surgical procedures performed between June 1, 2014, and November 27, 2018. Validation was performed using data from 22 300 inpatient surgical procedures collected prospectively from November 28, 2018, to September 20, 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: Algorithms for generalized additive models and random forest models were developed and validated using real-time EHR data. Model predictive performance was evaluated primarily using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) values. Results: Among 58 236 total adult patients who received 74 417 major inpatient surgical procedures, the mean (SD) age was 57 (17) years; 29 226 patients (50.2%) were male. Results reported in this article focus primarily on the validation cohort. The validation cohort included 22 300 inpatient surgical procedures involving 19 132 patients (mean [SD] age, 58 [17] years; 9672 [50.6%] male). A total of 2765 patients (14.5%) were Black or African American, 14 777 (77.2%) were White, 1235 (6.5%) were of other races (including American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, and multiracial), and 355 (1.9%) were of unknown race because of missing data; 979 patients (5.1%) were Hispanic, 17 663 (92.3%) were non-Hispanic, and 490 (2.6%) were of unknown ethnicity because of missing data. A greater number of input features was associated with stable or improved model performance. For example, the random forest model trained with 135 input features had the highest AUROC values for predicting acute kidney injury (0.82; 95% CI, 0.82-0.83); cardiovascular complications (0.81; 95% CI, 0.81-0.82); neurological complications, including delirium (0.87; 95% CI, 0.87-0.88); prolonged intensive care unit stay (0.89; 95% CI, 0.88-0.89); prolonged mechanical ventilation (0.91; 95% CI, 0.90-0.91); sepsis (0.86; 95% CI, 0.85-0.87); venous thromboembolism (0.82; 95% CI, 0.81-0.83); wound complications (0.78; 95% CI, 0.78-0.79); 30-day mortality (0.84; 95% CI, 0.82-0.86); and 90-day mortality (0.84; 95% CI, 0.82-0.85), with accuracy similar to surgeons' predictions. Compared with the original web portal, the mobile device application allowed efficient fingerprint login access and loaded data approximately 10 times faster. The application output displayed patient information, risk of postoperative complications, top 3 risk factors for each complication, and patterns of complications for individual surgeons compared with their colleagues. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, automated real-time predictions of postoperative complications with mobile device outputs had good performance in clinical settings with prospective validation, matching surgeons' predictive accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.