Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35575644›Full record

ReviewChemical Society reviews2022

Water electrolysis: from textbook knowledge to the latest scientific strategies and industrial developments.

Marian Chatenet, Bruno G Pollet, Dario R Dekel, Fabio Dionigi, Jonathan Deseure, Pierre Millet, Richard D Braatz, Martin Z Bazant, Michael Eikerling, Iain Staffell and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical Society reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 175 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
175citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

175 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. NiFMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Boosting HER/OER Activity of Ni-FeOOH Through S and V Co-Doping.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Strategies Enhancing the Efficiency of CoFe-Based Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Evolution Reaction in Alkaline.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2026
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. KSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

115 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Marian ChatenetUniversity Grenoble Alpes, University Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, Grenoble INP (Institute of Engineering and Management University Grenoble Alpes), LEPMI, 38000 Grenoble, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9673-4775
Bruno G PolletHydrogen Energy and Sonochemistry Research group, Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) NO-7491, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4928-7378
Dario R DekelThe Wolfson Department of Chemical Engineering, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, 3200003, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8610-0808
Fabio DionigiDepartment of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering Division, Technical University Berlin, 10623, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0576-024X
Jonathan DeseureUniversity Grenoble Alpes, University Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, Grenoble INP (Institute of Engineering and Management University Grenoble Alpes), LEPMI, 38000 Grenoble, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2055-7653
Pierre MilletParis-Saclay University, ICMMO (UMR 8182), 91400 Orsay, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0224-9868
Richard D BraatzDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4304-3484
Martin Z BazantDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8200-4501
Michael EikerlingChair of Theory and Computation of Energy Materials, Division of Materials Science and Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Intzestraße 5, 52072 Aachen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0764-8948
Iain StaffellCentre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1012-7075
Paul BalcombeDivision of Chemical Engineering and Renewable Energy, School of Engineering and Material Science, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3490-0707
Yang Shao-HornResearch Laboratory of Electronics and Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8714-2121
Helmut SchäferInstitute of Chemistry of New Materials, The Electrochemical Energy and Catalysis Group, University of Osnabrück, Barbarastrasse 7, 49076 Osnabrück, Germany. helmut.schaefer@uos.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5906-3354

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Replacing fossil fuels with energy sources and carriers that are sustainable, environmentally benign, and affordable is amongst the most pressing challenges for future socio-economic development. To that goal, hydrogen is presumed to be the most promising energy carrier. Electrocatalytic water splitting, if driven by green electricity, would provide hydrogen with minimal CO

Indexed as

Industrial DevelopmentWaterElectricityElectrolysisHumansHydrogenHydrogenWater

Identifiers

PMID35575644
PMCPMC9332215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.