Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35575578›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2022

Multicenter Population Pharmacokinetic Study of Unbound Ceftriaxone in Critically Ill Patients.

Aaron J Heffernan, Fekade B Sime, Nilesh Kumta, Steven C Wallis, Brett McWhinney, Jacobus Ungerer, Gloria Wong, Gavin M Joynt, Jeffrey Lipman, Jason A Roberts

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Penicillin-SusceptibleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Aaron J HeffernanUniversity of Queenslandgrid.1003.2 Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7929-9812
Fekade B SimeUniversity of Queenslandgrid.1003.2 Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4061-2063
Nilesh KumtaUniversity of Queenslandgrid.1003.2 Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Steven C WallisUniversity of Queenslandgrid.1003.2 Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Brett McWhinneyDepartment of Chemical Pathology, Pathology Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Jacobus UngererDepartment of Chemical Pathology, Pathology Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Gloria WongUniversity of Queenslandgrid.1003.2 Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Gavin M JoyntDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Jeffrey LipmanUniversity of Queenslandgrid.1003.2 Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Jason A RobertsUniversity of Queenslandgrid.1003.2 Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6218-435X
The University of Queensland · AUQueensland Health · AUChinese University of Hong Kong · HKGriffith University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to describe the total and unbound population pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone in critically ill adult patients and to define optimized dosing regimens. Total and unbound ceftriaxone concentrations were obtained from two pharmacokinetic studies and from a therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) program at a tertiary hospital intensive care unit. Population pharmacokinetic analysis and Monte Carlo simulations were used to assess the probability of achieving a free trough concentration/MIC ratio of ≥1 using Pmetrics for R. A total of 474 samples (267 total and 207 unbound) were available from 36 patients. A two-compartment model describing ceftriaxone-albumin binding with both nonrenal and renal elimination incorporating creatinine clearance to explain the between-patient variability best described the data. An albumin concentration of ≤20 g/L decreased the probability of target attainment (PTA) by up to 20% across different dosing regimens and simulated creatinine clearances. A ceftriaxone dose of 1 g twice daily is likely therapeutic in patients with creatinine clearance of <100 mL/min infected with susceptible isolates (PTA, ~90%). Higher doses administered as a continuous infusion (4 g/day) are needed in patients with augmented renal clearance (creatinine clearance, >130 mL/min) who are infected by pathogens with a MIC of ≥0.5 mg/L. The ceftriaxone dose should be based on the patient's renal function and albumin concentration, as well as the isolate MIC. Hypoalbuminemia decreases the PTA in patients receiving intermittent dosing by up to 20%.

Indexed as

CeftriaxoneCritical IllnessAdultAlbuminsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCreatinineHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMonte Carlo MethodAlbuminsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCeftriaxoneCreatinineceftriaxonedoseintensive careintensive care unitpharmacodynamicspharmacokineticspopulation pharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID35575578
PMCPMC9211414
OpenAlexW4280531041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.