Article in Journal of virology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
Current issues in molecular biology · 2026
Review
Biology · 2023
Review
4 · The record
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Namarta KaliaDepartment of Biological Sciences, George Washington Universitygrid.253615.6, Washington, DC, USA.
Kelsey A HauserDepartment of Biological Sciences, George Washington Universitygrid.253615.6, Washington, DC, USA.
Sarah BurtonNational Xenopus Resource and Eugene Bell Center for Regenerative Biology and Tissue Engineering, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, USA.
Muhammad Riadul Haque HossaineyDepartment of Biological Sciences, George Washington Universitygrid.253615.6, Washington, DC, USA.
Mira ZelleDepartment of Biological Sciences, George Washington Universitygrid.253615.6, Washington, DC, USA.
Marko E HorbNational Xenopus Resource and Eugene Bell Center for Regenerative Biology and Tissue Engineering, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, USA.
Leon GrayferDepartment of Biological Sciences, George Washington Universitygrid.253615.6, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1144-4884
George Washington University · USMarine Biological Laboratory · US
Funding
Resource CoreP40OD010997 · OD · MARINE BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY · PI Marko E Horb · 2012 to 2026
$13.1M
Xenopus Mutant ResourceR24OD030008 · OD · MARINE BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY · PI Marko E Horb · 2020 to 2026
$6.0M
HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH) P40OD010997HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH) R24OD030008NIH HHS P40 OD010997NIH HHS R24 OD030008
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
The global amphibian declines are compounded by infections with members of the
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Endogenous Retroviruses Augment Amphibian (Xenopus laevis) Tadpole Antiviral Protection. · full record | OpenQuestion