Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35575454›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine2022

Randomized controlled trial of suprascapular nerve blocks for subacute adhesive capsulitis.

Marc Schiltz, Nele Beeckmans, Bruno Gillard, Tom DE Baere, Samar M Hatem

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Drug Repurposing for Frozen Shoulder; a Bioinformatics Meta-Analysis.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marc SchiltzDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium - marc.schiltz@uzbrussel.be.
Nele BeeckmansDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Regional Hospital RZ Tienen, Tienen, Belgium.
Bruno GillardDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Clinique St-Jean, Brussels, Belgium.
Tom DE BaereDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, CHIREC Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Samar M HatemDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Clinique Saint Jean · BECentre Hospitalier Interrégional Edith Cavell · BEUniversitair Ziekenhuis Brussel · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShoulder pain and loss of function remain a therapeutic challenge in adhesive capsulitis. Suprascapular nerve blocks, a common treatment in adhesive capsulitis, are considered a safe and effective method for the resolution of pain and restoration of shoulder range of motion (ROM). To our knowledge, no data are available on the use of suprascapular nerve blocks in adhesive capsulitis in the subacute phase.

aimThe aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve blocks versus saline injections for treating adhesive capsulitis in the subacute phase.

designRandomized double-blinded controlled trial; level of evidence 2.

settingOut-patient consultation of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine in a general hospital. POPULATION: Thirty-five patients with subacute adhesive capsulitis.

methodsPatients were randomly allocated to receive either 3 successive (1-week interval) ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve blocks with ropivacaine 5 mL 2 mg/mL (intervention group) or ultrasound-guided injections of 5 mL sterile saline solution (NaCl 0.9%) (control group), at the floor of the suprascapular fossa. Primary outcome was shoulder function assessed by the Constant-Murley Score. Secondary outcomes were shoulder ROM and shoulder pain intensity. Assessments were performed before each injection and 4 weeks after the last injection.

resultsA significant increase of Constant-Murley Score (P<0.001), increase of shoulder ROM (all directions: P<0.011) and decrease of pain (P<0.001), were observed over time in both study groups. However, no significant differences were observed between the intervention and the control group.

conclusionsThree successive suprascapular nerve blocks did not provide a better outcome than saline injections on shoulder function, ROM, and pain in subacute adhesive capsulitis. These negative findings warrant some considerations on the natural history of adhesive capsulitis, as well as timing, type, and placebo effects of injections. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: The current place of suprascapular nerve blocks in the treatment strategy of adhesive capsulitis needs to be rediscussed.

Indexed as

BursitisNerve BlockShoulder JointHumansInjections, Intra-ArticularRange of Motion, ArticularShoulderShoulder PainTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID35575454
PMCPMC9987327
OpenAlexW4280631036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.