Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35575435›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons2022

Molecular diagnosis of ABMR with or without donor-specific antibody in kidney transplant biopsies: Differences in timing and intensity but similar mechanisms and outcomes.

Philip F Halloran, Katelynn S Madill-Thomsen, Shane Pon, Majid L N Sikosana, Georg A Böhmig, Jonathan Bromberg, Gunilla Einecke, Farsad Eskandary, Gaurav Gupta, Luis G Hidalgo and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Dual inhibition of mTOR and calcineurin pathways mitigates missing self-induced NK cell-mediated microvascular rejection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Sensitization in Transplantation Assessment of Risk 2025 innate working group: The potential role of innate allorecognition in kidney allograft damage.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Antibody-mediated rejection-treatment standard.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Expanding role of antibodies in kidney transplantation.World journal of transplantation · 2025
    Review
  16. Biomarkers of Rejection in Kidney Transplantation.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2025
    Review
  17. Targeting CD38 in Antibody-Mediated Rejection.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025
    Review
  18. Development of Non-HLA Antibodies and Their Association With Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Philip F HalloranAlberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1371-1947
Katelynn S Madill-ThomsenAlberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Shane PonAlberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Majid L N SikosanaAlberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Georg A BöhmigDivision of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-7600-912X
Jonathan BrombergUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Gunilla EineckeDepartment of Nephrology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Farsad EskandaryDivision of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Gaurav GuptaDivision of Nephrology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1919-1970
Luis G HidalgoUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Marek MyslakDepartment of Clinical Interventions, Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation SPWSZ Hospital, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
Ondrej ViklickyDepartment of Nephrology and Transplant Center, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-1049-2195
Agnieszka Perkowska-PtasinskaDepartment of Pathology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5524-3534
INTERCOMEX Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We studied the clinical, histologic, and molecular features distinguishing DSA-negative from DSA-positive molecularly defined antibody-mediated rejection (mABMR). We analyzed mABMR biopsies with available DSA assessments from the INTERCOMEX study: 148 DSA-negative versus 248 DSA-positive, compared with 864 no rejection (excluding TCMR and Mixed). DSA-positivity varied with mABMR stage: early-stage (EABMR) 56%; fully developed (FABMR) 70%; and late-stage (LABMR) 58%. DSA-negative patients with mABMR were usually sensitized, 60% being HLA antibody-positive. Compared with DSA-positive mABMR, DSA-negative mABMR was more often C4d-negative; earlier by 1.5 years (average 2.4 vs. 3.9 years); and had lower ABMR activity and earlier stage in molecular and histology features. However, the top ABMR-associated transcripts were identical in DSA-negative versus DSA-positive mABMR, for example, NK-associated (e.g., KLRD1 and GZMB) and IFNG-inducible (e.g., PLA1A). Genome-wide class comparison between DSA-negative and DSA-positive mABMR showed no significant differences in transcript expression except those related to lower intensity and earlier time of DSA-negative ABMR. Three-year graft loss in DSA-negative mABMR was the same as DSA-positive mABMR, even after adjusting for ABMR stage. Thus, compared with DSA-positive mABMR, DSA-negative mABMR is on average earlier, less active, and more often C4d-negative but has similar graft loss, and genome-wide analysis suggests that it involves the same mechanisms. SUMMARY SENTENCE: In 398 kidney transplant biopsies with molecular antibody-mediated rejection, the 150 DSA-negative cases are earlier, less intense, and mostly C4d-negative, but use identical molecular mechanisms and have the same risk of graft loss as the 248 DSA-positive cases.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationAntibodiesBiopsyGraft RejectionHumansIsoantibodiesTissue DonorsAntibodiesIsoantibodiesbasic (laboratory) research/sciencebiopsykidney transplantation/nephrologymicroarray/gene arrayrejectionrejection: antibody-mediated (ABMR)

Identifiers

PMID35575435
PMCPMC9540308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.