Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35575424›Full record

ArticleInteractive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2022

Effect of preservation solution and distension pressure on saphenous vein's endothelium.

Matheus Duarte Pimentel, José Glauco Lobo Filho, Heraldo Guedis Lobo Filho, Emílio de Castro Miguel, Sergimar Kennedy Pinheiro Paiva, João Igor Silva Matos, Matheus Augusto Mesquita Fernandes, Francisco Vagnaldo Fechine Jamacaru

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Matheus Duarte PimentelDepartment of Surgery, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9833-3943
José Glauco Lobo FilhoDepartment of Surgery, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Heraldo Guedis Lobo FilhoDepartment of Surgery, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Emílio de Castro MiguelDepartment of Metallurgical Engineering and Materials (DEMM) and Analytical Center, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Sergimar Kennedy Pinheiro PaivaDepartment of Metallurgical Engineering and Materials (DEMM) and Analytical Center, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.
João Igor Silva MatosFederal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Matheus Augusto Mesquita FernandesFederal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Francisco Vagnaldo Fechine JamacaruFederal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesApproaches to improve saphenous vein (SV) patency in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery remain relevant. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different preservation solutions and different pressures of intraluminal distention on the endothelium of SV segments in CABG.

methodsForty-two SV segments obtained from 12 patients undergoing CABG were divided into 7 groups. Group 1 (control) was prepared without preservation or intraluminal distension, while the other 6 groups were preserved in autologous heparinized autologous arterial blood or normal saline (NS), with distention pressures 30, 100 and 300 mmHg. To assess the effects of using these solutions and pressures on the endothelium, the grafts were analysed by scanning electron microscopy, with the measurement of endothelial damage degree.

resultsSegments in group 1 showed minimal endothelial damage. SV grafts preserved with NS had significantly greater endothelial damage both compared to the control group and compared to groups preserved with autologous arterial blood (P < 0.001). Segments distended with pressures up to 100 mmHg showed less damage when compared to those distended at 300 mmHg, with the ones subjected to higher pressures presenting a maximum degree of damage, with considerable loss and separation of endothelial cells, extensive foci of exposure of the basement membrane and numerous fractures of the intimate layer, without differences regarding the solution used.

conclusionsPreparation of SV using NS and with intraluminal distension pressures above 100 mmHg is factors related to increased damage to the venous endothelium.

Indexed as

Endothelial CellsSaphenous VeinCoronary Artery BypassDilatation, PathologicEndothelium, VascularHumansCoronary artery bypass graftingDistension pressurePreservation solutionSaphenous vein

Identifiers

PMID35575424
PMCPMC9419693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.