Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35575349›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2022

InterPepScore: a deep learning score for improving the FlexPepDock refinement protocol.

Isak Johansson-Åkhe, Björn Wallner

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Isak Johansson-ÅkheDivision of Bioinformatics, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1696-0183
Björn WallnerDivision of Bioinformatics, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3772-8279
Linköping University · SE

Funding

SeRC VR 2020-03352SNIC, KAW and LiU through NSC002E
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationInteractions between peptide fragments and protein receptors are vital to cell function yet difficult to experimentally determine in structural details of. As such, many computational methods have been developed to aid in peptide-protein docking or structure prediction. One such method is Rosetta FlexPepDock which consistently refines coarse peptide-protein models into sub-Ångström precision using Monte-Carlo simulations and statistical potentials. Deep learning has recently seen increased use in protein structure prediction, with graph neural networks used for protein model quality assessment.

resultsHere, we introduce a graph neural network, InterPepScore, as an additional scoring term to complement and improve the Rosetta FlexPepDock refinement protocol. InterPepScore is trained on simulation trajectories from FlexPepDock refinement starting from thousands of peptide-protein complexes generated by a wide variety of docking schemes. The addition of InterPepScore into the refinement protocol consistently improves the quality of models created, and on an independent benchmark on 109 peptide-protein complexes its inclusion results in an increase in the number of complexes for which the top-scoring model had a DockQ-score of 0.49 (Medium quality) or better from 14.8% to 26.1%. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: InterPepScore is available online at http://wallnerlab.org/InterPepScore. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Deep LearningComputer SimulationMonte Carlo MethodPeptidesProtein ConformationProteinsPeptidesProteins

Identifiers

PMID35575349
PMCPMC9191208
OpenAlexW4280632798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.