Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35575110›Full record

ArticleJournal of Korean Academy of Nursing2022

[Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Climate, Health, and Nursing Tool].

Da Woon Jeong, Gwang Suk Kim, Min Kyung Park

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Climate Change and Nursing.Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Da Woon JeongCollege of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7590-2338
Gwang Suk KimCollege of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9823-6107
Min Kyung ParkCollege of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea. minkyung1262@naver.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2568-8855

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeClimate change has various negative effects on human health, which has resulted in increased burden on the health care system. Nurses contribute significantly to assessing climate-related health risks and creating a healthy environment. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Climate, Health, and Nursing Tool (K-CHANT) to measure nurses' awareness, motivation, concern, and behaviors at work and at home regarding climate change and health.

methodsThe 22 items of English CHANT were translated into Korean with forward-backward translation techniques. Internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, and construct validity using confirmatory factor analysis were performed using SPSS WIN (25.0) and AMOS (26.0). Survey data were collected from 220 master's, doctoral, and post-doctoral nursing students.

resultsThe K-CHANT consists of 20 items across 5 domains. Two items of the original CHANT were excluded because of low content validity index and standardized regression weights. The internal consistency reliability of the K-CHANT, assessed by Cronbach's αá was .81, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of .66~.90. The five subscales model was validated by confirmatory factor analysis (SRMR < .08, RMSEA < .08, AGFI > .70, CFI > .70).

conclusionThe K-CHANT has satisfactory construct validity and reliability to measure nurses' awareness, motivation, concern, and behaviors at work and at home regarding climate change and health. Future research should examine nurses' perceptions and behaviors related to the health effects of climate change and develop an action plan to improve it.

Indexed as

TranslatingFactor Analysis, StatisticalHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsRepublic of KoreaSurveys and QuestionnairesBehaviorClimate ChangeNursesPerceptionReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID35575110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.