ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2022
Concomitant Hepatorenal Dysfunction and Malnutrition in Valvular Heart Surgery: Long-Term Prognostic Implications for Death and Heart Failure.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical value of the water injection, dilution, and drainage method for blind nasoenteric tube placement in patients receiving sequential enteral nutrition support after major thoracic surgery.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Predictive Value of MELD Score and Charlson Comorbidity Index in Thoracic Aortic Surgery Patients.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Article
- Prevalence, Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of Vascular Disease in Valvular Heart Surgery: A Multi-Centre Study.Global heart · 2025Article
- Assessment of cardio-renal-hepatic function in patients with valvular heart disease: a multi-biomarker approach-the cardio-renal-hepatic score.BMC medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Strategies to improve long-term prediction of heart failure and death in valvular surgery are urgently needed because of an increasing number of procedures globally. This study sought to report the prevalence, changes, and prognostic implications of concomitant hepatorenal dysfunction and malnutrition in valvular surgery. Methods and Results In 909 patients undergoing valvular surgery, 3 groups were defined based on hepatorenal function (the modified model for end-stage liver disease excluding international normalized ratio score) and nutritional status (Controlling Nutritional Status score): normal hepatorenal function and nutrition (normal), hepatorenal dysfunction or malnutrition alone (mild), and concomitant hepatorenal dysfunction and malnutrition (severe). Overall, 32%, 46%, and 19% of patients were classified into normal, mild, and severe groups, respectively. Over a 4.1-year median follow-up, mild and severe groups incurred a higher risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 3.17 [95% CI, 1.40-7.17] and HR, 9.30 [95% CI, 4.09-21.16], respectively), cardiovascular death (subdistribution HR, 3.29 [95% CI, 1.14-9.52] and subdistribution HR, 9.29 [95% CI, 3.09-27.99]), heart failure hospitalization (subdistribution HR, 2.11 [95% CI, 1.25-3.55] and subdistribution HR, 3.55 [95% CI, 2.04-6.16]), and adverse outcomes (HR, 2.11 [95% CI, 1.25-3.55] and HR, 3.55 [95% CI, 2.04-6.16]). Modified model for end-stage liver disease excluding international normalized ratio and controlling nutritional status scores improved the predictive ability of European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (area under the curve: 0.80 versus 0.73,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.