Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35574900›Full record

ArticleMolecular oncology2022

In situ expression of ERG protein in the context of tumor heterogeneity identifies prostate cancer patients with inferior prognosis.

Susanne G Kidd, Mari Bogaard, Kristina T Carm, Anne Cathrine Bakken, Aase M V Maltau, Marthe Løvf, Ragnhild A Lothe, Karol Axcrona, Ulrika Axcrona, Rolf I Skotheim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Susanne G KiddDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital-Radiumhospitalet, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-1789-7523
Mari BogaardDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital-Radiumhospitalet, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-3628-0249
Kristina T CarmDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital-Radiumhospitalet, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-6138-3576
Anne Cathrine BakkenDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital-Radiumhospitalet, Norway.
Aase M V MaltauDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital-Radiumhospitalet, Norway.
Marthe LøvfDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital-Radiumhospitalet, Norway.
Ragnhild A LotheDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital-Radiumhospitalet, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-1693-1032
Karol AxcronaDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital-Radiumhospitalet, Norway.
Ulrika AxcronaDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital-Radiumhospitalet, Norway.
Rolf I SkotheimDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital-Radiumhospitalet, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5609-4048
Oslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prognostic biomarkers for prostate cancer are needed to improve prediction of disease course and guide treatment decisions. However, biomarker development is complicated by the common multifocality and heterogeneity of the disease. We aimed to determine the prognostic value of candidate biomarkers transcriptional regulator ERG and related ETS family genes, while considering tumor heterogeneity. In a multisampled, prospective, and treatment-naïve radical prostatectomy cohort from one tertiary center (2010-2012, median follow-up 8.1 years), we analyzed ERG protein (480 patients; 2047 tissue cores), and RNA of several ETS genes in a subcohort (165 patients; 778 fresh-frozen tissue samples). Intra- and interfocal heterogeneity was identified in 29% and 33% (ERG protein) and 39% and 27% (ETS RNA) of patients, respectively. ERG protein and ETS RNA was identified exclusively in a nonindex tumor in 31% and 32% of patients, respectively. ERG protein demonstrated independent prognostic value in predicting biochemical (P = 0.04) and clinical recurrence (P = 0.004) and appeared to have greatest prognostic value for patients with Grade Groups 4-5. In conclusion, when heterogeneity is considered, ERG protein is a robust prognostic biomarker for prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorProstatic NeoplasmsTranscriptional Regulator ERGHumansMaleProspective StudiesProstatectomyRNATrans-ActivatorsBiomarkers, TumorERG protein, humanRNATrans-ActivatorsTranscriptional Regulator ERGbiomarkerERGETSheterogeneityprognosisprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID35574900
PMCPMC9348599
OpenAlexW4280504796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.