Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35574857›Full record

SynthesisStatistics in medicine2022

Accounting for publication bias using a bivariate trim and fill meta-analysis procedure.

Chongliang Luo, Arielle Marks-Anglin, Rui Duan, Lifeng Lin, Chuan Hong, Haitao Chu, Yong Chen

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Statistics in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Frontiers in genetics · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chongliang LuoDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3682-9454
Arielle Marks-AnglinDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Rui DuanDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9261-4864
Lifeng LinDepartment of Statistics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3562-9816
Chuan HongDepartment of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Haitao ChuDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Yong ChenDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0835-0788

Funding

TRiPOD: Toward Reusable Phenotypes in Observational Data for AD/ADRD - managing definitions and correcting biasR01AG073435 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CHEN, YONG, XU, HUA · 2021 to 2025
$3.9M
Dynamic learning for post-vaccine event prediction using temporal information in VAERSR01AI130460 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI CHEN, YONG, TAO, CUI · 2017 to 2021
$3.4M
Characterizing Disease Trajectory for Improving Treatment in Pediatric Crohn's DiseaseR01HD099348 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI HUANG, JING · 2019 to 2023
$3.2M
PheBC: bias correction methods for EHR derived phenotypeR01LM013519 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CHEN, YONG, XU, HUA · 2021 to 2024
$1.6M
Advancing Drug Repositioning for Alzheimer’s Disease using Real-world DataR56AG069880 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BIAN, JIANG, CHEN, YONG · 2021 to 2022
$1.6M
CICADA: clinical informatics and computational approaches for drug-repositioning of AD/ADRDR56AG074604 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CHEN, YONG, TAO, CUI · 2021 to 2022
$1.5M
A General Framework to Account for Outcome Reporting Bias in Systematic ReviewsR01LM012607 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CHEN, YONG · 2017 to 2020
$1.4M
Statistical Methods and Software for Multivariate Meta-analysisR01LM012982 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI LIN, LIFENG, SIEGEL, LIANNE · 2019 to 2022
$1.3M
Joint modeling of continuous and binary data in meta-analysisR03MH128727 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI LIN, LIFENG · 2022 to 2023
$146k
NIAID NIH HHS 1R01AI130460NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI130460NIA NIH HHS 1R01AG073435NIA NIH HHS 1R56AG074604NIA NIH HHS R01 AG073435NIA NIH HHS R56 AG069880NIA NIH HHS R56AG069880NIA NIH HHS R56 AG074604NICHD NIH HHS 1R01HD099348NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD099348NIMH NIH HHS R03 MH128727NIMH NIH HHS R03MH128727NLM NIH HHS 1R01LM012607NLM NIH HHS 1R01LM013519NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012607NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012982NLM NIH HHS R01LM012982NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013519Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute ME-2018C3-14899Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute ME-2019C3-18315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In research synthesis, publication bias (PB) refers to the phenomenon that the publication of a study is associated with the direction and statistical significance of its results. Consequently, it may lead to biased (commonly optimistic) estimates of treatment effects. Visualization tools such as funnel plots have been widely used to investigate PB in univariate meta-analyses. The trim and fill procedure is a nonparametric method to identify and adjust for PB. It is popular among applied scientists due to its simplicity. However, most visualization tools and PB correction methods focus on univariate outcomes. For a meta-analysis with multiple outcomes, the conventional univariate trim and fill method can only account for different outcomes separately and thus may lead to inconsistent conclusions. In this article, we propose a bivariate trim and fill procedure to simultaneously account for PB in the presence of two outcomes that are possibly associated. Based on a recently developed galaxy plot for bivariate meta-analysis, the proposed procedure uses a data-driven imputation algorithm to detect and adjust PB. The method relies on the symmetry of the galaxy plot and assumes that some studies are suppressed based on a linear combination of outcomes. The method projects bivariate outcomes along a particular direction, uses the univariate trim and fill method to estimate the number of trimmed and filled studies, and yields consistent conclusions about PB. The proposed approach is validated using simulated data and is applied to a meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of antidepressant drugs.

Indexed as

Publication BiasHumansantidepressant drugbivariate meta-analysisgalaxy plotpublication biastrim and fill

Identifiers

PMID35574857
PMCPMC12208082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.