Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35574852›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2022

The super wicked problem of ocean health: a socio-ecological and behavioural perspective.

Kristy de Salas, Jennifer Louise Scott, Benjamin Schüz, Kimberley Norris

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Introduction to the Special Issue-Nurturing resilient marine ecosystems.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kristy de SalasUniversity of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2552-5108
Jennifer Louise ScottUniversity of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6955-4015
Benjamin SchüzUniversity of Bremen, Bremen, Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0801-498X
Kimberley NorrisUniversity of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia.
University of Tasmania · AUHochschule Bremen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We are dependent on our oceans for economic, health and social benefits; however, demands on our oceans are escalating, and the state of the oceans is deteriorating. Only 2% of countries are on track to achieve the desired outcomes for the sustainable development goal (SDG 14) for the oceans by 2030, and the changes needed to prevent further degradation, or limit the impact of existing degradation, are not being undertaken fast enough. This paper uses a socio-ecological lens to explore the nature of actors and behaviours for change at the local, community, state, national and international levels, and introduces the need for technology, information- and knowledge-sharing, and policy as interconnected mediators, that work both in concert, and independently, to address the 'super wicked' problem of ocean health and to promote resilience. We recommend the need to develop transformational teams and leaders, as well as transformative policies within a holistic and integrated system to ensure ocean health initiatives are greater than the sum of their parts and are actual, realistic, achievable and evidence-informed pathways to change. This article is part of the theme issue 'Nurturing resilient marine ecosystems'.

Indexed as

EcosystemSustainable DevelopmentKnowledgeOceans and Seasbehaviourocean healthresiliencesustainabilitywicked problem

Identifiers

PMID35574852
PMCPMC9108938
OpenAlexW4280534769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.