Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35574850›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2022

Building bridges between natural and social science disciplines: a standardized methodology to combine data on ecosystem quality trends.

I Richter, B R Roberts, S F Sailley, E Sullivan, V V Cheung, J Eales, M Fortnam, J B Jontila, C Maharja, T Ha Nguyen and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Building bridges between natural and social science disciplines: a standardized methodology to combine data on ecosystem quality trends.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  4. Introduction to the Special Issue-Nurturing resilient marine ecosystems.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 11 institutions in 7 countries.

I RichterSchool of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1196-2769
B R RobertsEuropean Centre for Environment and Human Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK.
S F SailleyPlymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, Devon, UK.
E SullivanPlymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, Devon, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9720-8980
V V CheungSchool of Biological and Marine Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon, UK.
J EalesEuropean Centre for Environment and Human Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK.
M FortnamDepartment of Geography, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK.
J B JontilaCollege of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Western Philippines University, Puerto Princesa, Palawan, the Philippines.ORCID 0000-0003-3452-1341
C MaharjaCentre for Sustainable Energy and Resources Management, Universitas Nasional, Jakarta, Indonesia.
T Ha NguyenFaculty of Social Work, Hanoi National University of Education, Hanoi, Vietnam.
S PahlSchool of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon, UK.
R A PraptiwiCentre for Sustainable Energy and Resources Management, Universitas Nasional, Jakarta, Indonesia.
J SugardjitoCentre for Sustainable Energy and Resources Management, Universitas Nasional, Jakarta, Indonesia.
J D C SumeldanCollege of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Western Philippines University, Puerto Princesa, Palawan, the Philippines.
W M SyazwanDepartment of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Built Environment, Universitas Esa Unggul, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0001-5598-7701
A Y ThenInstitute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
M C AustenSchool of Biological and Marine Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8133-0498
University of Exeter · GBNasional University · IDPlymouth Marine Laboratory · GBUniversity of Plymouth · GBWestern Philippines University · PHHanoi National University of Education · VNNorwegian University of Science and Technology · NOUniversitas Esa Unggul · IDUniversiti Putra Malaysia · MYUniversity of Malaya · MYUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite a growing interest in interdisciplinary research, systematic ways of how to integrate data from different disciplines are still scarce. We argue that successful resource management relies on two key data sources: natural science data, which represents ecosystem structure and processes, and social science data, which describes people's perceptions and understanding. Both are vital, mutually complementing information sources that can underpin the development of feasible and effective policies and management interventions. To harvest the added value of combined knowledge, a uniform scaling system is needed. In this paper, we propose a standardized methodology to connect and explore different types of quantitative data from the natural and social sciences reflecting temporal trends in ecosystem quality. We demonstrate this methodology with different types of data such as fisheries stocks and mangrove cover on the one hand and community's perceptions on the other. The example data are collected from three United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) Biosphere reserves and one marine park in Southeast Asia. To easily identify patterns of convergence or divergence among the datasets, we propose heat maps using colour codes and icons for language- and education-independent understandability. Finally, we discuss the limitations as well as potential implications for resource management and the accompanying communication strategies. This article is part of the theme issue 'Nurturing resilient marine ecosystems'.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemFisheriesHumansSocial SciencesUnited Nationscoastal communitiesinterdisciplinaritymappingmarine resourcessustainabilityun ocean decade

Identifiers

PMID35574850
PMCPMC9108946
OpenAlexW4280544448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.