Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35574711›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of mental health nursing2022

Trauma-informed mental health practice during COVID-19: Reflections from a Community of Practice initiative.

Davi Manzini Macedo, Julie-Anne Reilly, Sophie Pettit, Carmen Negoita, Laura Ruth, Elizabeth Cox, Rima Staugas, Nicholas Procter

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of mental health nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Davi Manzini MacedoUniversity of South Australia's Mental Health and Suicide Prevention Research and Education Group, South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9342-0888
Julie-Anne ReillyRoyal Adelaide Hospital Mental Health Short Stay Unit, South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Sophie PettitRoyal Adelaide Hospital Mental Health Short Stay Unit, South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Carmen NegoitaRoyal Adelaide Hospital Mental Health Short Stay Unit, South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Laura RuthRoyal Adelaide Hospital Mental Health Short Stay Unit, South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Elizabeth CoxRoyal Adelaide Hospital Mental Health Short Stay Unit, South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Rima StaugasRoyal Adelaide Hospital Mental Health Short Stay Unit, South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7289-3165
Nicholas ProcterUniversity of South Australia's Mental Health and Suicide Prevention Research and Education Group, South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Royal Adelaide Hospital · AUUniversity of South Australia · AU

Funding

University of South Australia
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article discusses insights arising from a Community of Practice (CoP) initiative within a mental health short stay inpatient unit adjacent to a major Emergency Department to explore how COVID-19 has influenced engagement and support of people in mental distress. The present initiative was designed as a collaboration between the University of South Australia and SA Health. Community of Practice (CoP) is combined with a narrative review of current evidence to explain specific nursing care responses within an operating environment of pandemic-induced fear and uncertainty. Meetings discussed the challenges associated with delivering mental health care for people experiencing mental health distress in the COVID-19 context. Applying trauma-informed principles to mental health care delivery was identified to be of relevance in the context of an ongoing pandemic. Humanizing nursing care and increasing people's sense of predictability and safety contributed to therapeutic engagement and support during COVID-19. Factors discussed to mitigate the effects of safety measures include, for example, nuanced verbal and non-verbal engagement of health workers with people in mental distress when wearing personal protective equipment (PPE). We highlight the need to 'humanise' nursing and openly communicating that both practitioners and people in distress are navigating special circumstances. The CoP participants additionally acknowledged that the experience of moral distress among frontline health workers needs to be addressed in future policy responses to COVID-19. Person-centred and trauma-informed responses at the point of care might help to mitigate the pandemic short- and long-term effects for both service users and frontline health workers.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mental DisordersHealth PersonnelHumansMental HealthPandemicsCOVID-19mental health nursingmental health recoverypsychosocial nursingSARS-CoV-2trauma-informed practice

Identifiers

PMID35574711
PMCPMC9321098
OpenAlexW4280548428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.