Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35574578›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Exploring the feasibility and acceptability of a sleep wearable headband among a community sample of chronic pain individuals: An at-home observational study.

Zoe Zambelli, Cecilia E Jakobsson, Laura Threadgold, Antonio R Fidalgo, Elizabeth J Halstead, Dagmara Dimitriou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zoe ZambelliSleep Education and Research Laboratory, Psychology and Human Development, UCL-Institute of Education, London, WC1H 0AA, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6604-213X
Cecilia E JakobssonSleep Education and Research Laboratory, Psychology and Human Development, UCL-Institute of Education, London, WC1H 0AA, UK.
Laura ThreadgoldSleep Education and Research Laboratory, Psychology and Human Development, UCL-Institute of Education, London, WC1H 0AA, UK.
Antonio R FidalgoSchool of Psychology, University of East London, London, E15 4LZ, UK.
Elizabeth J HalsteadSleep Education and Research Laboratory, Psychology and Human Development, UCL-Institute of Education, London, WC1H 0AA, UK.
Dagmara DimitriouSleep Education and Research Laboratory, Psychology and Human Development, UCL-Institute of Education, London, WC1H 0AA, UK.
University College London · GBUniversity of East London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chronic pain conditions affect up to one third of the adult population in the United Kingdom. Sleep problems are prevalent and negatively impact quality of life. Lack of standardised tools for routine screening and assessment of sleep changes have been a barrier for sleep management. Novel sleep wearables offer an exciting and accessible way to measure sleep but have not been tested outside of the consumer-led landscape and are not commonly used in research and clinical settings. Aims: The study aimed to explore the feasibility and acceptability of a sleep monitoring headband (Dreem 2) utilising EEG technology and accompanying smartphone application among a cohort of adults with chronic pain. Results: Twenty-one adults (81% women) completed a one-week home sleep study using a sleep headband and accompanying app. Ninety per cent of participants met the pre-defined requirement of two-night's sleep recording. All participants recorded one night of sleep data via the sleep headband. The majority (76%) of participants were satisfied with the sleep study, and 86% of participants were willing to wear the headband longer than the 2-night minimum requirement. Finally, 76% reported the headband as 'somewhat' or 'extremely' comfortable whist awake; 57% rated the headband as comfortable during sleep. Conclusion: The Dreem 2 headband appears to be a feasible and acceptable means of collecting sleep measurements among individuals with chronic pain, despite common sleep disturbances. These devices may have utility for screening, assessment and monitoring in research and practice. Further research is needed to provide guidelines and training for integration.

Indexed as

acceptabilitychronic painEEGFeasibilitysleep quality

Identifiers

PMID35574578
PMCPMC9102155
OpenAlexW4280652753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.