Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35574534›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in surgery2022

Lung Metastases: Current Surgical Indications and New Perspectives.

Giuseppe Mangiameli, Ugo Cioffi, Marco Alloisio, Alberto Testori

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Artificial pneumothorax during image-guided thermal ablation for treatment of a solitary paramediastinal lung metastasis.Kardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Polish journal of cardio-thoracic surgery · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Radiomics in Lung Metastases: A Systematic Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Giuseppe MangiameliDivision of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Ugo CioffiDepartment of Surgery, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Marco AlloisioDivision of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Alberto TestoriDivision of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Humanitas University · ITIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulmonary metastasectomy is an established treatment that can provide improved long- term survival for patients with metastatic tumor(s) in the lung. In this mini-review, we discuss the state of the art of thoracic surgery in surgical management of lung metastases which actually occurs for a large part of surgical activity in thoracic surgery department. We describe the principles of surgical therapy that have been defined across the time, and that should remain the milestones of lung metastases treatment: a radical surgery and an adequate lymphadenectomy. We then focus on current surgical indications and report the oncological results according to the surgical approach (open vs. mini-invasive), the histological type and number of lung metastases, and in case of re-metastasectomy. Finally, we conclude with a brief overview about the future perspectives in thoracic surgery in treatment of lung metastases.

Indexed as

indicationslung metastasespulmonary metastasectomysecondary lung cancerthoracic surgerywedge resections

Identifiers

PMID35574534
PMCPMC9098997
OpenAlexW4225129637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.