Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35574482›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2022

Tissue Flossing Around the Thigh Does Not Provide Acute Enhancement of Neuromuscular Function.

Armin H Paravlic, Jure Segula, Kristina Drole, Vedran Hadzic, Maja Pajek, Janez Vodicar

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05094713 nacompletednot on this map

Effects of Tissue Flossing on Muscle Contractile Properties and Jumping Performance in Recreationally Active Students

TypeinterventionalSponsorScience and Research Centre KoperRan2021 to 2021Enrolled19ConditionsIschemia, Placebo - ControlArmsFlossing experimental group, Low wrapping pressure
NCT05219344 nacompletednot on this map

Effects of Different Volumes of Tissue Flossing Around Thigh Muscle on Neuromuscular Function

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of LjubljanaRan2021 to 2021Enrolled19ConditionsPhysical Performance, Neuromuscular Function, Tissue Flossing, Ischemic PreconditioningArmsTissue flossing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Acute effects of tissue flossing on boxers with chronic knee pain.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  6. Tissue Flossing: A Commentary on Clinical Practice Recommendations.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Armin H ParavlicFaculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Jure SegulaFaculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Kristina DroleFaculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Vedran HadzicFaculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Maja PajekFaculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Janez VodicarFaculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nowadays, various methods are used for acute performance enhancement. The most recent of these is tissue flossing, which is becoming increasingly popular for both performance enhancement and rehabilitation. However, the effects of flossing on athletic performance have not been clearly demonstrated, which could be due to differences in the methodology used. In particular, the rest periods between the end of the preconditioning activity and the performance of the criterion task or assessment tools varied considerably in the published literature. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the effects of applying tissue flossing to the thigh on bilateral countermovement jump performance and contractile properties of vastus lateralis (VL) muscle. Nineteen recreational athletes (11 males; aged 23.1 ± 2.7 years) were randomly assigned to days of flossing application (3 sets for 2 min of flossing with 2 min rest between sets) with preset experimental pressure (EXP = 95 ± 17.4 mmHg) or control condition (CON = 18.9 ± 3.5 mmHg). The first part of the measurements was performed before and after warm-up consisting of 5 min of cycling followed by dynamic stretching and specific jumping exercises, while the second part consisted of six measurement points after flossing application (0.5, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 min). The warm-up improved muscle response time (VL = -5%), contraction time (VL = -3.6%) muscle stiffness (VL = 17.5%), contraction velocity (VL = 23.5%), jump height (13.9%) and average power (10.5%). On the contrary, sustain time, half-relaxation time and take-off velocity stayed unaltered. Flossing, however, showed negative effects for muscle response time (F = 18.547,

Indexed as

athletic performancecountermovement jump (CMJ)functional performanceischemic preconditioning (IPC)potentiationtensiomyography (TMG)

Identifiers

PMID35574482
PMCPMC9091176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.