Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35574311›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

A Phase I Trial to Determine the Safety and Tolerability of Autophagy Inhibition Using Chloroquine or Hydroxychloroquine in Combination With Carboplatin and Gemcitabine in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors.

Nagla Abdel Karim, Asad Ullah, Imran Ahmad, Elmustapha Bahassi, Olugbenga Olowokure, Ahmed Khaled, Harold Davis, John C Morris

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Chloroquine and Chemotherapeutic Compounds in Experimental Cancer Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nagla Abdel KarimDivision of Hematology/Oncology-Augusta University, Augusta, GA, United States.
Asad UllahDivision of Hematology/Oncology-Augusta University, Augusta, GA, United States.
Imran AhmadDivision of Hematology/Oncology-The University of Cincinnati, Augusta, GA, United States.
Elmustapha BahassiDivision of Hematology/Oncology-The University of Cincinnati, Augusta, GA, United States.
Olugbenga OlowokureDivision of Hematology/Oncology-The University of Cincinnati, Augusta, GA, United States.
Ahmed KhaledGlaxoSmithKline, Division of Solid Tumors-Augusta, Augusta, GA, United States.
Harold DavisDivision of Hematology/Oncology-The University of Cincinnati, Augusta, GA, United States.
John C MorrisDivision of Hematology/Oncology-The University of Cincinnati, Augusta, GA, United States.
University of Cincinnati · USAugusta University · USGlaxoSmithKline (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Autophagy is a catabolic process that is triggered in cells during periods of metabolic or hypoxic stress, which enables their survival during this challenge. Autophagy may also impart survival advantage to tumors cells undergoing attack from chemotherapy or radiation. Inhibition of early-stage autophagy can rescue cancer cells, while inhibition of late-stage autophagy enhances cell death due to accumulation of damaged organelles. The antiparasitic drugs chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) inhibit late-phase autophagy. We assessed the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of combining CQ or HCQ with carboplatin and gemcitabine (CG) in patients with refractory advanced solid tumors. Methods: This single institution phase 1 dose-escalation study was designed to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of CQ/HCQ, in combination with CG, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Secondary objectives were to determine overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). A starting dose of CQ or HCQ 50 mg was used in conjunction with standard starting doses of CG and increased in increments of 50 mg in each patient dose cohort. Grade 3 or greater toxicity that is treatment related, and was not self-limited, or not controlled in <7 days was considered dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Results: Twenty-two patients were enrolled. All patients had at least one prior treatment, and 11 of them had 3 prior regimens. CQ/HCQ 100 mg daily was found to be the MTD in combination with CG with thrombocytopenia and/or neutropenia dose limiting. The median overall (OS) was 11 months, and the 1- and 3-year OS were 30% and 7%, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 5 months, and the 6-, 12-, and 18-month progression-free survivals were 48%, 21%, and 14%, respectively. Conclusion: The MTD identified for CQ/HCQ was lower than previously reported with concomitant use of chemotherapeutic regimes likely due to the myelosuppressive nature of CG in previously treated patients.

Indexed as

autophagychloroquinelung cancerphase 1solid tumor

Identifiers

PMID35574311
PMCPMC9102974
OpenAlexW4225000350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.