Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35574295›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Is Lymph Node Dissection Necessary During Radical Nephroureterectomy for Clinically Node-Negative Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma? A Multi-Institutional Study.

Hsiang-Ying Lee, Chao-Hsiang Chang, Chi-Ping Huang, Chih-Chin Yu, Chi-Wen Lo, Shiu-Dong Chung, Wei-Che Wu, I-Hsuan Alan Chen, Jen-Tai Lin, Yuan-Hong Jiang and 16 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07321210 (Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Radical Nephroureterectomy With Versus Without Template Lymph Node Dissection in High-Risk Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07321210 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Radical Nephroureterectomy With Versus Without Template Lymph Node Dissection in High-Risk Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorTianjin Medical University Second HospitalRan2025 to 2032Enrolled150ConditionsUpper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma, Lymph Node DissectionArmsTemplate Lymph Node Dissection, Selective Lymph Node Resection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Hsiang-Ying LeeDepartment of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Chao-Hsiang ChangDepartment of Urology, China Medical University and Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Chi-Ping HuangDepartment of Urology, China Medical University and Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Chih-Chin YuDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Chi-Wen LoDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Shiu-Dong ChungGraduate Program in Biomedical Informatics, College of Informatics, Yuan-Ze University, Chung-Li, Taiwan.
Wei-Che WuDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
I-Hsuan Alan ChenDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Jen-Tai LinDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Yuan-Hong JiangDepartment of Urology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation and Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.
Yu-Khun LeeDepartment of Urology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation and Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.
Thomas Y HsuehDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei City Hospital Renai Branch, Taipei, Taiwan.
Allen W ChiuCollege of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yung-Tai ChenDepartment of Urology, Taiwan Adventist Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chang-Min LinDepartment of Urology, Taiwan Adventist Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yao-Chou TsaiDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Wei-Chieh ChenDepartment of Urology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Bing-Juin ChiangCollege of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Hsu-Che HuangDepartment of Urology, Cardinal Tien Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Chung-Hsin ChenDepartment of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chao-Yuan HuangDepartment of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chia-Chang WuDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Wei Yu LinDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan.
Jen-Shu TsengDepartment of Urology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hung-Lung KeDepartment of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Hsin-Chih YehDepartment of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the oncological outcomes of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) without clinical lymph node metastasis (cN0) undergoing lymph node dissection (LND) during radical nephroureterectomy (NU). Methods: From the updated data of the Taiwan UTUC Collaboration Group, a total of 2726 UTUC patients were identified. We only include patients with ≥ pT2 stage and enrolled 658 patients. The Kaplan-Meier estimator and Cox proportional hazards model were used to analyze overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease-free survival (DFS), and bladder recurrence-free survival (BRFS) in LND (+) and LND (-) groups. Results: A total of 658 patients were included and 463 patients without receiving LND and 195 patients receiving LND. From both univariate and multivariate survival analysis, there are no significant difference between LND (+) and LND (-) group in survival rate. In LND (+) group, 18.5% patients have pathological LN metastasis. After analyzing pN+ subgroup, it revealed worse CSS (p = 0.010) and DFS (p < 0.001) compared with pN0 patients. Conclusions: We found no significant survival benefit related to LND in cN0 stage, ≥ pT2 stage UTUC, irrespective of the number of LNs removed, although pN+ affected cancer prognosis. However, from the result of pN (+) subgroup of LND (+) cohort analysis, it may be reasonable to not perform LND in patients with cT2N0 stage due to low positive predictive value of pN (+). In addition, performing LND may be considered for ureter cancer, which tends to cause lymphatic and hematogenous tumor spreading. Further large prospective studies are needed to validate our findings.

Indexed as

clinical lymph node negativelymph node dissectionmuscle-invasive stagepathological lymph node positiveupper tract urothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID35574295
PMCPMC9099435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.