ArticleDisplays2022
ViDMASK dataset for face mask detection with social distance measurement.
Article in Displays, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Face mask wearing image dataset: A comprehensive benchmark for image-based face mask detection models.Data in brief · 2023Article
- Real-time social distance measurement and face mask detection in public transportation systems during the COVID-19 pandemic and post-pandemic Era: Theoretical approach and case study in Italy.Transportation research interdisciplinary perspectives · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 outbreak has extenuated the need for a monitoring system that can monitor face mask adherence and social distancing with the use of AI. With the existing video surveillance systems as base, a deep learning model is proposed for mask detection and social distance measurement. State-of-the-art object detection and recognition models such as Mask RCNN, YOLOv4, YOLOv5, and YOLOR were trained for mask detection and evaluated on the existing datasets and on a newly proposed video mask detection dataset the ViDMASK. The obtained results achieved a comparatively high mean average precision of 92.4% for YOLOR. After mask detection, the distance between people's faces is measured for high risk and low risk distance. Furthermore, the new large-scale mask dataset from videos named ViDMASK diversifies the subjects in terms of pose, environment, quality of image, and versatile subject characteristics, producing a challenging dataset. The tested models succeed in detecting the face masks with high performance on the existing dataset, MOXA. However, with the VIDMASK dataset, the performance of most models are less accurate because of the complexity of the dataset and the number of people in each scene. The link to ViDMask dataset and the base codes are available at https://github.com/ViDMask/VidMask-code.git.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.