Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35574235›Full record

ReviewNature reviews psychology2022

Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory.

Marylène Gagné, Sharon K Parker, Mark A Griffin, Patrick D Dunlop, Caroline Knight, Florian E Klonek, Xavier Parent-Rocheleau

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
63.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 330 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Self-Determination Theory and Workplace Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis.Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marylène GagnéFuture of Work Institute, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3248-8947
Sharon K ParkerFuture of Work Institute, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0978-1873
Mark A GriffinFuture of Work Institute, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4326-7752
Patrick D DunlopFuture of Work Institute, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5225-6409
Caroline KnightFuture of Work Institute, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9894-7750
Florian E KlonekFuture of Work Institute, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4466-0890
Xavier Parent-RocheleauDepartment of Human Resources Management, HEC Montréal, Montréal, Québec Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5015-3214
Curtin University · AUHEC Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-determination theory has shaped our understanding of what optimizes worker motivation by providing insights into how work context influences basic psychological needs for competence, autonomy and relatedness. As technological innovations change the nature of work, self-determination theory can provide insight into how the resulting uncertainty and interdependence might influence worker motivation, performance and well-being. In this Review, we summarize what self-determination theory has brought to the domain of work and how it is helping researchers and practitioners to shape the future of work. We consider how the experiences of job candidates are influenced by the new technologies used to assess and select them, and how self-determination theory can help to improve candidate attitudes and performance during selection assessments. We also discuss how technology transforms the design of work and its impact on worker motivation. We then describe three cases where technology is affecting work design and examine how this might influence needs satisfaction and motivation: remote work, virtual teamwork and algorithmic management. An understanding of how future work is likely to influence the satisfaction of the psychological needs of workers and how future work can be designed to satisfy such needs is of the utmost importance to worker performance and well-being.

Indexed as

Human behaviourPsychologyScience, technology and society

Identifiers

PMID35574235
PMCPMC9088153
OpenAlexW4229457720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.