ArticleInfection prevention in practice2022
Nasal carriage of meticillin-resistant
Article in Infection prevention in practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- A meta-analysis on the prevalence of resistance of Staphylococcus aureus to different antibiotics in Nigeria.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2023Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Children living with HIV (CLWH) are at risk of colonisation and infection with meticillin-resistant Aim: To estimate the prevalence of nasal colonisation with Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed in the infectious diseases clinics of two public hospitals in Kano involving 214 CLWH/caregiver pairs. Children were selected from clinic registers by simple random sampling and an interviewer-administered questionnaire used to elicit factors associated with MRSA carriage from the caregivers. Clinical records were reviewed for patients' medical histories. Standard laboratory techniques were used to isolate Results: Nasal Conclusions: The rate of MRSA nasal colonisation among CLWH in Kano was similar to that reported in other studies in Africa. Infection prevention and control measures including MRSA screening and decolonisation, as well as education for CLWH and their carers should be introduced to reduce MRSA spread.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.