Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35574152›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2022

Getting the word out: Methods of learning about research and motivations for participation in a study focusing on a reproductive-aged Latina/x population.

Nicole M Sekula, Torie C Plowden, Anne Waldo, Richard Bryce, Maricela Castillo-Mackenzie, Sonia Acosta, Felix Valbuena, Mercedes Carnethon, Erica E Marsh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole M SekulaDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Torie C PlowdenDepartment of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Womack Army Medical Center, Ft Bragg, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9086-2947
Anne WaldoDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Richard BryceCommunity Health and Social Services (CHASS) Center, Detroit, MI, USA.
Maricela Castillo-MackenzieDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Sonia AcostaCentro Multicultural LA Familia (CMLF), Pontiac, MI, USA.
Felix ValbuenaCommunity Health and Social Services (CHASS) Center, Detroit, MI, USA.
Mercedes CarnethonDepartment of Preventative Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Erica E MarshDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1331-6525
University of Michigan · USHealth Services Center · USNorthwestern University · USTrinity Health Oakland Hospital · USWomack Army Medical Center · US

Funding

ELLAS Environment, Leiomyomas, Latinas and Adiposity StudyR01MD011570 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MARSH, ERICA E · 2016 to 2021
$3.5M
NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD011570
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although one of the fastest-growing populations in the USA, Latinx individuals remain underrepresented in research. In this study, we aimed to identify how Latina/Latinx participants of the Environment, Leiomyomas, Latinas, and Adiposity Study (ELLAS) learned about the research study and what motivated them to participate. Materials and Methods: Using a standardized survey tool, bilingual staff interviewed participants and asked them, 1) how they heard about ELLAS and 2) to identify and rank their top three reasons for participating in ELLAS. Results: "Word of mouth" through a friend or relative was the most common method of learning about ELLAS (49.0%), followed by a "community outreach event" (29.3%). The three most common reasons for participating in ELLAS were "to learn more about women's health" (83.3%), "to receive a free health assessment" (79.4%), and "to contribute to scientific knowledge" (59.5%). Correlation between demographic and socioeconomic characteristics and participant responses indicated that there are different reasons for participation based on these factors. Conclusions: Community engagement and word of mouth are vital to the successful recruitment of Latina/Latinx participants to research studies. Latinx participants are most motivated to participate by health benefits and health education, as well as altruistic aspects of research studies. Therefore, establishing mutually beneficial relationships within Latinx communities and appealing to motivations for research participation with close attention to the demographics of participants can both expand and allow for targeted recruitment efforts for this underrepresented group in research studies.

Indexed as

Community engagementdiverse study populationsLatinxreproductive healthstudy recruitment and retention

Identifiers

PMID35574152
PMCPMC9066315
OpenAlexW4210699156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.