ArticleBioactive materials2023
Degradation of 3D-printed magnesium phosphate ceramics
Article in Bioactive materials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- In Vivo Degradation Behaviour and Osteoregenerative Capacity of 3D-Printed Magnesium Phosphate and Calcium Magnesium Phosphate Cement Scaffolds.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Matrices of Different Natures for Bone Tissue Engineering-A Comparative Analysis.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Biomaterial-Based Additive Manufactured Composite/Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine: A Comprehensive Review.Polymers · 2025Review
- Evaluation of the Characteristics of Digital Light Processing 3D-Printed Magnesium Calcium Phosphate for Bone Regeneration.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Advances in biomaterials for osteonecrosis treatment.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- In Vivo Investigation of 3D-Printed Calcium Magnesium Phosphate Wedges in Partial Load Defects.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Multifaceted Materials for Enhanced Osteogenesis and Antimicrobial Properties on Bioplastic Polyetheretherketone Surfaces: A Review.ACS omega · 2024Review
- Characterization of hFOB 1.19 Cell Line for Studying Zn-Based Degradable Metallic Biomaterials.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Exploring the potential of magnesium oxychloride, an amorphous magnesium phosphate, and newberyite as possible bone cement candidates.Journal of biomaterials applications · 2023Article
- Translating Material Science into Bone Regenerative Medicine Applications: State-of-The Art Methods and Protocols.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Regenerative bone implants promote new bone formation and ideally degrade simultaneously to osteogenesis. Although clinically established calcium phosphate bone grafts provide excellent osseointegration and osteoconductive efficacy, they are limited in terms of bioresorption. Magnesium phosphate (MP) based ceramics are a promising alternative, because they are biocompatible, mechanically extremely stable, and degrade much faster than calcium phosphates under physiological conditions. Bioresorption of an implant material can include both chemical dissolution as well as cellular resorption. We investigated the bioresorption of 3D powder printed struvite and newberyite based MP ceramics
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.