Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35574027›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2022

Estrogenic Pastures: A Source of Endocrine Disruption in Sheep Reproduction.

Kelsey R Pool, Faustine Chazal, Jeremy T Smith, Dominique Blache

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Date Palm Pollen (Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Mammalian Species-Specific Resistance to Mammary Cancer.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kelsey R PoolSchool of Agriculture and Environment M087, University of Western Australia Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.
Faustine ChazalSchool of Agriculture and Environment M087, University of Western Australia Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.
Jeremy T SmithSchool of Agriculture and Environment M087, University of Western Australia Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.
Dominique BlacheSchool of Agriculture and Environment M087, University of Western Australia Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phytoestrogens can impact on reproductive health due to their structural similarity to estradiol. Initially identified in sheep consuming estrogenic pasture, phytoestrogens are known to influence reproductive capacity in numerous species. Estrogenic pastures continue to persist in sheep production systems, yet there has been little headway in our understanding of the underlying mechanisms that link phytoestrogens with compromised reproduction in sheep. Here we review the known and postulated actions of phytoestrogens on reproduction, with particular focus on competitive binding with nuclear and non-nuclear estrogen receptors, modifications to the epigenome, and the downstream impacts on normal physiological function. The review examines the evidence that phytoestrogens cause reproductive dysfunction in both the sexes, and that outcomes depend on the developmental period when an individual is exposed to phytoestrogen.

Indexed as

PhytoestrogensReproductionAnimalsEstradiolEstrogensReceptors, EstrogenSheepEstradiolEstrogensPhytoestrogensReceptors, Estrogenclover diseaseendocrine disruptorphytoestrogenreproductionruminant

Identifiers

PMID35574027
PMCPMC9097266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.