Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35573993›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in endocrinology2022

The Evaluation of Ovarian Function Recovery Following Treatment of Primary Ovarian Insufficiency: A Systematic Review.

Xiaojun Kuang, Yongzhe Tang, Hong Xu, Min Ji, Dongmei Lai

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Value of Platelet-Rich Plasma Treatment in Reproductive Disorders: An Umbrella Review.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaojun KuangThe International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yongzhe TangThe International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Hong XuSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Med-X Research Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Min JiThe International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Dongmei LaiThe International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNInternational Peace Maternity & Child Health Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Primary ovarian insufficiency (POI) is gaining awareness as its prevalence increases and its effect on patients is extremely negative. To date, several therapies have been designed to treat POI, but the conclusions are conflicting, in part, due to inconsistent evaluation methods. Thus, we explore a multi-index of ovarian function assessment methods to evaluate the recovery of ovarian function after various therapies in order to evaluate effectiveness in a more comprehensive manner. Aim: The purpose of this review is to assess the effectiveness of various therapies to recover ovarian function in patients with POI. The primary outcome measures were anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) levels, and antral follicle count (AFC). The secondary outcomes included the change of mean ovarian volume, menstruation recovery, and pregnancy rate. Methods: Our systematic searching including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Embase databases was conducted to find all human clinical trial articles published from January 2000 to April 2021 and related to POI treatment, including the keywords: POI, AFC, and hormones. All prospective and retrospective studies exploring ovarian function recovery that include AFC, AMH levels, and FSH levels evolution throughout treatment were included. All patients included in the studies met the POI criteria described by the European Society for Human Reproductive Embryology (ESHRE) guideline. Results: Six studies were selected based on the criteria: one randomized controlled trial and five observational studies. Among them, two studies focused on the intraovarian platelet-rich plasma (PRP) infusion treatment, two studies focused on dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) supplements, one study focused on hormone replacement therapy (HRT), and one study focused on autologous adipose-derived stromal cells (ADSCs) treatment. There was insufficient scientific evidence that any approach could help ovarian function recovery in patients with POI because the ovarian function markers in each study had inconsistent changes with 26 patients (6.2%) reporting spontaneous pregnancy. Conclusion: Serum AMH levels, FSH levels, and AFC are sensitive indicators and reflect the evolution of ovarian function. Large randomized controlled trials are necessary, and the data on ovarian function should be collected comprehensively to evaluate the effectiveness of a variety of treatments.

Indexed as

Ovarian ReservePrimary Ovarian InsufficiencyAnti-Mullerian HormoneFemaleFollicle Stimulating HormoneHumansPregnancyProspective StudiesRecovery of FunctionRetrospective StudiesAnti-Mullerian HormoneFollicle Stimulating Hormoneanti-Müllerian hormoneantral follicle countfollicle-stimulating hormoneovarian functionprimary ovarian insufficiency

Identifiers

PMID35573993
PMCPMC9095968
OpenAlexW4224992968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.