Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35573982›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on education2019

Integrating Model-Based Approaches into a Neuroscience Curriculum-An Interdisciplinary Neuroscience Course in Engineering.

Benjamin Latimer, David A Bergin, Vinay Guntu, David J Schulz, Satish S Nair

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Open Source Software Tools for Teaching Neuroscience.Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Benjamin LatimerElectrical Engineering and Computer Science Department, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211 USA.
David A BerginEducational, School and Counseling Psychology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211 USA.
Vinay GuntuElectrical Engineering and Computer Science Department, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211 USA.
David J SchulzDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211 USA.
Satish S NairElectrical Engineering and Computer Science Department, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1489-7029
University of Missouri · US

Funding

CRCNS: Modeling Acquisition and Extinction of Fear Memories in Amygdala CircuitsR01MH087755 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI NAIR, SATISH S · 2009 to 2011
$728k
Interdisciplinary Training in Computational Neuroscience for Researchers from Graduate and Medical Students to Junior FacultyR25MH109122 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI NAIR, SATISH S · 2015 to 2017
$508k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH087755NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH109122
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contribution: This paper demonstrates curricular modules that incorporate engineering model-based approaches, including concepts related to circuits, systems, modeling, electrophysiology, programming, and software tutorials that enhance learning in undergraduate neuroscience courses. These modules can also be integrated into other neuroscience courses. Background: Educators in biological and physical sciences urge incorporation of computation and engineering approaches into biology. Model-based approaches can provide insights into neural function; prior studies show these are increasingly being used in research in biology. Reports about their integration in undergraduate neuroscience curricula, however, are scarce. There is also a lack of suitable courses to satisfy engineering students' interest in the challenges in the growing area of neural sciences. Intended Outcomes: (1) Improved student learning in interdisciplinary neuroscience; (2) enhanced teaching by neuroscience faculty; (3) research preparation of undergraduates; and 4) increased interdisciplinary interactions. Application Design: An interdisciplinary undergraduate neuroscience course that incorporates computation and model-based approaches and has both software- and wet-lab components, was designed and co-taught by colleges of engineering and arts and science. Findings: Model-based content improved learning in neuroscience for three distinct groups: 1) undergraduates; 2) Ph.D. students; and 3) post-doctoral researchers and faculty. Moreover, the importance of the content and the utility of the software in enhancing student learning was rated highly by all these groups, suggesting a critical role for engineering in shaping the neuroscience curriculum. The model for cross-training also helped facilitate interdisciplinary research collaborations.

Indexed as

Biological neural networksbiomedical engineeringbrain modelingcomputational neuroscienceexperiential learningneural engineering

Identifiers

PMID35573982
PMCPMC9107338
OpenAlexW2911733318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.