Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35573936›Full record

ArticlePersonality and individual differences2022

Superstitious beliefs, locus of control, and feeling at risk in the face of Covid-19.

Arvid Hoffmann, Daria Plotkina, Patrick Roger, Catherine D'Hondt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Personality and individual differences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Number 19: Another Victim of the COVID-19 Pandemic?Journal of gambling studies · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Arvid HoffmannAdelaide Business School, University of Adelaide, 10 Pulteney Street, SA 5005 Adelaide, Australia.
Daria PlotkinaEM Strasbourg Business School, University of Strasbourg, 61 Avenue de la Forêt Noire, 67100 Strasbourg, France.
Patrick RogerEM Strasbourg Business School, University of Strasbourg, 61 Avenue de la Forêt Noire, 67100 Strasbourg, France.
Catherine D'HondtLouvain School of Management & Louvain Finance (LIDAM), UCLouvain, Chaussée de Binche 151, 7000 Mons, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unprecedented uncertainty during the Covid-19 pandemic stimulated anxiety among individuals, while the associated health restrictions contributed to a feeling of loss of control. Prior research suggests that, in times of crisis, some individuals rely on superstitious beliefs as a coping mechanism, but it remains unclear whether superstition is positively or negatively associated with fear of Covid-19 during the pandemic, and the role that individuals' locus of control plays in this regard. In two studies conducted among individuals in Belgium and the U.S., we therefore examined the relationship between superstitious beliefs, locus of control, and feeling at risk of Covid-19. Across both countries, we found that superstition is positively, and internal locus of control negatively, related with feeling at risk of Covid-19. Moreover, in Belgium, the effect of superstition was less pronounced for individuals with a higher level of internal locus of control. The absence of an interaction effect between superstition and locus of control in the U.S. could be explained by this country's higher level of superstitious beliefs and lower level of internal locus of control combined with a stronger feeling of being at risk of Covid-19 or cultural differences such as Belgium's higher uncertainty avoidance compared to the U.S.

Indexed as

Covid-19FearFeeling at riskLocus of controlPandemicSuperstitious beliefs

Identifiers

PMID35573936
PMCPMC9085462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.