ReviewJournal of clinical medicine research2022
State of the Art, Current Perspectives, and Controversies of Budd-Chiari Syndrome: A Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endovascular stenting of chronic retrohepatic inferior vena cava interruption in Budd-Chiari syndrome.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2026Article
- [Emphasis on the etiological diagnosis and management of non-cirrhotic portal hypertension].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2026Review
- Article
- Review
- Budd-Chiari syndrome: Prognostic scores, special populations, and management challenges.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Budd-Chiari syndrome in a 33-year-old woman with hypercoagulable state: A case report.Radiology case reports · 2025Article
- Navigating the crossroads: exploring the intersection of celiac disease and Budd-Chiari syndrome - insights, challenges, and management strategies.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- A Rare Case of Budd-Chiari Syndrome in a Young Female.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
- Common features of Budd Chiari syndrome in Sudanese population: a computed tomography-based review and descriptive analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Budd-Chiari syndrome mimicking autoimmune hepatitis.Radiology case reports · 2023Article
- Budd-Chiari syndrome in myeloproliferative neoplasms: A review of literature.World journal of clinical oncology · 2023Review
- The evolution of the liver transplant candidate.Frontiers in transplantation · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) is an eponym that includes a group of conditions characterized by partial or complete hepatic venous tract outflow obstruction, and the site of obstruction may involve one or more hepatic veins, inferior vena cava, or the right atrium. The classification of BCS is based on etiology, site of obstruction, and duration. Its etiology is very heterogeneous; in particular, hepatic vein thrombosis is the most common type of obstruction and myeloproliferative disorder, the most common thrombophilic disorder, in the West. In Asian countries, the type of obstruction, thrombophilic disorders, clinical features, and treatment strategies vary widely from region to region. Although the cause can be identified in 90% of patients with the help of gene mutation testing, BCS remains under-recognized in many countries. A higher prevalence of acute cases has been reported in the West than in the East. This global and regional heterogeneity raises several challenges regarding the evaluation, management strategy, and individualized approach of BCS. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of BCS to elucidate treatment strategy options. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases were searched systematically. Results: Sixty-nine pertinent articles were retrieved and included in the present study. Conclusions: Further research on the following three topics would help define individualized treatment strategies. The first is a better understanding of the molecular pathways underlying the thrombophilic conditions implicated in the pathogenesis of BCS. The second is the role of the genotype and gene mutations in the determination of coagulation status of patients with BCS. The third is the definition of clear criteria and development of a common prognostic index to risk stratify the patients at presentation and consequently detect candidates for invasive therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.