Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35573664›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2022

Improved Methods for Deamination-Based m

Huanyu Zhu, Xinhe Yin, Christopher L Holley, Kate D Meyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Role of NMedComm · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Loss of age-associated increase in mbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Single-cell mNature neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  9. Analysis of RNA and Its Modifications.Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.) · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. RBM45 is an mCell reports · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Huanyu ZhuDepartment of Biochemistry, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.
Xinhe YinDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.
Christopher L HolleyDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.
Kate D MeyerDepartment of Biochemistry, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.

Funding

Center for Multi-Scale Analysis of the Human EpitranscriptomeRM1HG011563 · NHGRI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI SAMIE R JAFFREY, Kathryn D Meyer · 2021 to 2026
$22.2M
Epitranscriptomic Regulation of Synaptic Responses to Drugs of AbuseDP1DA046584 · NIDA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MEYER, KATHRYN D · 2018 to 2022
$2.4M
Mechanistic Insights into m6A-Mediated Regulation of Brain DevelopmentR01MH118366 · NIMH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MEYER, KATHRYN D · 2019 to 2023
$2.0M
Epitranscriptomic Control of Local Gene Expression in Neural Stem CellsR21MH119813 · NIMH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MEYER, KATHRYN D, SILVER, DEBRA · 2019 to 2020
$435k
NHGRI NIH HHS RM1 HG011563NIDA NIH HHS DP1 DA046584NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH118366NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH119813
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

DART-seqepitranscriptomem6ARNA biologyRNA modification

Identifiers

PMID35573664
PMCPMC9092492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.