Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35573659›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychopathology and behavioral assessment2022

Examining the dimensionality of anxiety and depression: A latent profile approach to modeling transdiagnostic features.

Julia S Yarrington, Craig K Enders, Richard E Zinbarg, Susan Mineka, Michelle G Craske

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychopathology and behavioral assessment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julia S YarringtonDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, 502 Portola Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095.
Craig K EndersDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, 502 Portola Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095.
Richard E ZinbargDepartment of Psychology, Northwestern University, 2029 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208.
Susan MinekaDepartment of Psychology, Northwestern University, 2029 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208.
Michelle G CraskeDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, 502 Portola Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095.

Funding

Common and Specific Risk Factors for Emotional DisordersR01MH065651 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CRASKE, MICHELLE G · 2002 to 2011
$3.6M
Common and specific risk factors for emotoinal disordersR01MH065652 · NIMH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI MINEKA, SUSAN, ZINBARG, RICHARD E · 2002 to 2011
$3.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH065651NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH065652
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Depression and anxiety are highly prevalent psychological disorders; our understanding of these conditions remains limited. Efforts to explain anxiety and depression have been constrained in part by binary classification systems. Dimensional approaches to understanding psychopathology may be more effective. The present study used latent profile analysis (LPA) to assess whether unique subgroups exist within a tri-level model of anxiety and depression. Participants (N=627) completed self-report questionnaires from which tri-level model factors were derived. LPA was conducted on those factors. A 4-profile model offered optimal fit to the data at baseline. This model was replicated at a second time point. Models derived included profiles labelled 'Mixed Fears,' 'Anxious Arousal,' 'Low Mood/Anhedonia,' and 'Sub-Clinical.' Profiles were validated at Time 1 using

Indexed as

anxietydepressiondimensionallatent variables

Identifiers

PMID35573659
PMCPMC9094145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.