ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2022
ECG differences and ECG predictors in patients presenting with ST segment elevation due to myocardial infarction versus takotsubo syndrome.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pregnancy-Associated Takotsubo Syndrome: A Narrative Review of the Literature.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Takotsubo cardiomyopathy in India and its electrocardiography (ECG) comparison to myocardial infarction.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2024Article
- Temporal electrocardiographic changes in anterior ST elevation myocardial infarction versus the Takotsubo syndrome.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2023Article
- Recent highlights on acute myocardial infarction and takotsubo syndrome from the International Journal of Cardiology: Heart & Vasculature.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Previous studies comparing electrocardiogram (ECG) in Takotsubo syndrome (TS) versus ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) included TS patients without ST elevation, did not consider the culprit lesion in STEMI or had groups that were unbalanced regarding sex and age. Accounting for these factors, we sought to conduct a more reliable comparison of ECG in TS with ST-elevation (STE-TS) versus STEMI. The secondary aim was to investigate if ST segment changes, T wave inversion or prolonged QT interval predicted ventricular arrhythmia or death in STE-TS and STEMI. Methods: All STE-TS patients who presented at Sahlgrenska University Hospital between 2008 and 2019 were matched by sex and age to STEMI patients. STEMI patients were subcategorized according to whether or not the culprit lesion was located in the left anterior descending artery (LAD). Baseline characteristics, in-hospital outcomes and admission ECGs were analyzed. Results: 104 STE-TS patients were sex- and age-matched with 274 STEMI patients (113 LAD-STEMI, 161 non-LAD STEMI). Admission ECG in STE-TS was more similar to LAD STEMI than non-LAD STEMI. Reciprocal ST depression was less common in STE-TS (7/104, 6.7%) compared with STEMI (112/274, 41%; p= < 0.001). The sum of all ST elevations and the sum of all ST-deviations predicted life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia (LTVA) or death in LAD STEMI but not in STE-TS. Conclusions: In conclusion, admission ECG in STE-TS was similar to LAD STEMI but reciprocal ST depression was less common in STE-TS compared with STEMI overall. ST segment changes predicted LTVA or death in STEMI but not in STE-TS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.