Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35573580›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Survey of Anesthesia, Sedation, and Non-sedation Practices for Children Undergoing Repetitive Cranial or Craniospinal Radiotherapy.

Pascal Owusu-Agyemang, January Y Tsai, Ravish Kapoor, Antoinette Van Meter, Gee Mei Tan, Sarah Peters, Lucas Opitz, Dino Pedrotti, Hernando S DeSoto, Acsa M Zavala

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Pascal Owusu-AgyemangAnesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
January Y TsaiAnesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
Ravish KapoorAnesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
Antoinette Van MeterAnesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
Gee Mei TanAnesthesiology, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, USA.
Sarah PetersDepartment of Particle Therapy, Essen University Hospital, Essen, DEU.
Lucas OpitzAnesthesiology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, FRA.
Dino PedrottiAnesthesiology, St. Chiara Hospital, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS), Trento, ITA.
Hernando S DeSotoAnesthesiology, The University of Florida Health Science Center Jacksonville, Jacksonville, USA.
Acsa M ZavalaAnesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
Centre Antoine Lacassagne · FREssen University Hospital · DEThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USChildren's Hospital Colorado · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Children undergoing cranial or craniospinal radiotherapy may require over 30 treatments within a six-week period. Facilitating these many treatments with the patient under anesthesia presents a significant challenge, and the most preferred anesthetic methods remain unknown. The primary goal of this study was to determine the most preferred anesthetic methods and agents for children undergoing daily cranial or craniospinal radiotherapy. Methods An 83-item web-based survey was developed. An introductory email was sent to 505 physicians and child-life specialists with expertise in pediatric anesthesia and/or affiliated with pediatric radiation oncology departments. Results The response rate was 128/505 (25%) and included specialists from Africa (5, 4%), Asia (18, 14%), Australia/Oceania (5, 4%), Europe (45, 35%), North America (50, 39%), and South America (5, 4%). The 128 respondents included 91 anesthesiologists (71%), 20 physicians who were not anesthesiologists (16%), 14 child life/social education specialists (11%), one radiotherapist, one pediatric radiation nurse, and one non-specified medical professional (all = 2%). Of the 128 respondents, 95 (74%) used anesthesia or sedation to facilitate repetitive cranial or craniospinal radiotherapy. Overall, total intravenous anesthesia without intubation was preferred by 67 of 95 (71%) specialists during one or more forms of radiotherapy. During photon-based radiotherapy, total intravenous anesthesia without intubation was the preferred anesthetic method with the patient in the supine (57/84, 68%) and prone positions (25/40, 63%). Propofol was the most used anesthetic agent for both supine (73/84, 87%) and prone positions (38/40, 95%). For proton radiotherapy, total intravenous anesthesia without intubation was the most preferred anesthetic method for the supine (32/42, 76%) and prone treatment positions (11/18, 61%), and propofol was the most used anesthetic (supine: 40/43, 93%; prone: 16/18, 89%). Conclusions In this survey of 95 specialists responsible for anesthesia or sedation of children undergoing repetitive cranial or craniospinal radiotherapy, propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia without intubation was the preferred anesthetic technique.

Indexed as

anesthesiologypediatricsradiotherapyrepetitivesedation

Identifiers

PMID35573580
PMCPMC9097856
OpenAlexW4223487593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.