ArticleCureus2022
Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Evaluation of Pediatric Patients With Developmental Delay: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Diagnostic Yield of Investigating Developmental Regression in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Brain network characteristics and behavioral correlations in global developmental delay based on functional near-infrared spectroscopy.iScience · 2026Article
- Efficacy analysis of comprehensive rehabilitation therapy based on the Gesell developmental schedules among infants with global developmental delay of different ages: a retrospective study.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Developmental delay refers to the insufficient acquisition of age-appropriate developmental milestones. According to World Health Organization, approximately 5% of all children under the age of 14 years display some developmental disability. Aim and objective Our objective was to investigate the prevalence of abnormal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain findings in pediatric patients with non-syndromic developmental delay and to establish the utility of MRI for the same. Material and Method This cross-sectional study prospectively enrolled 60 pediatric patients (three months to 12 years) and data were analyzed using SPSS software. Result Abnormalities on MRI were seen in 80% of cases, with findings indicating perinatal hypoxic insult (36.67%) being the most common, followed by structural abnormalities of the brain (20%). There was no significant difference in the prevalence of abnormal findings when classified by gender or age, or between global developmental delay (GDD) alone and GDD with epilepsy. However, perinatal hypoxic insult was significantly associated with GDD with epilepsy rather than GDD alone (p < 0.01). Conclusion In this study, brain MRI provides a high yield of abnormal findings and helps calculate the relative prevalence of various common etiologies in non-syndromic developmental delay. This study supports several international guidelines that include MRI as the first-line investigation for non-syndromic developmental delay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.