ArticleCureus2022
Measuring the Electromagnetic Field of Human Subjects Using Induction Sensors and a Shielded Helmet Without the Need for a Shielded Room.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- A Swine Model of Changes in the Neuronal Electromagnetic Field After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Pilot Study.Cureus · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Neurologic activity is mediated by electrochemical signaling pathways that generate an electric charge. These electrical signals generate electromagnetic fields (EMF) that have been found to be measurable through magnetoencephalography and induction sensors. These technologies typically rely on expensive shielding via shielded rooms to remove influence from the external environment. We aimed to investigate the effects of a lightweight shielded helmet constructed of Mu-metal and interlaced copper mesh and Mu-metal EMF "channels" on shielding externally mediated EMF when measuring cortically generated EMF during human activity. Methods Non-contact, non-invasive, proprietary induction sensors were utilized with a combination of a dual-layer Mu-metal and interlaced copper mesh helmet with sensors placed within EMF channels connected to the helmet. Five human volunteers participated in motor activities, verbalization activities, and visual object naming to evaluate the effectiveness of shielding solely via the helmet and EMF channel construct on generated EMF without placement of individuals within a shielded room. Background data without a subject were obtained. Results Differences in fast Fourier transformed data were noted in the background compared to rest and various activities throughout all trials. There were differences in rest phases and activity phases in each individual identifying active measurement of differences in cortically generated EMF during each activity. Conclusion It appears that eliminating a Mu-metal shielded room is possible when shielding is isolated to the helmet and EMF channels with induction sensors. The external EMF was appropriately excluded with differences in background data in all trials. During the activity, differences were noted between rest phases and activity phases in all activities noting the discernibility of these induction sensors in measuring cortically generated EMF. Measured activity through motor tapping with changes between 4 and 6 Hz appeared to correlate with previously documented changes during motor activity using these sensors in conjunction with shielded rooms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.