Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35573492›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of a Primer Incorporated Orthodontic Composite Resin: An In-Vitro Study.

Rithika Joseph, Nausheer Ahmed, Abrar Younus A, K Ranjan R Bhat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. In vitro comparison of different composite resins for aligner attachment production : Amount of adhesive flash, flash removal time, and shear bond strength.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rithika JosephDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Government Dental College and Research Institute Bangalore, Bangalore, IND.
Nausheer AhmedDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Government Dental College and Research Institute Bangalore, Bangalore, IND.
Abrar Younus ADepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Government Dental College and Research Institute Bangalore, Bangalore, IND.
K Ranjan R BhatDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Government Dental College and Research Institute Bangalore, Bangalore, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Newer adhesive systems are available eliminating the separate priming step during the bonding procedure thereby reducing the chances of introduction of error during bonding. The purpose of this study was to compare the shear bond strength of a primer-incorporated adhesive with that of a self-etching primer system and conventional bonding system. Materials and method Sixty-six extracted human premolars were cleaned, mounted, and randomly divided into three groups. In group A (control), 22 teeth were bonded with stainless steel orthodontic brackets using the conventional bonding system; in group B, 22 teeth were bonded using a self-etching primer system (Transbond Plus SEP, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA) and in group C, 22 teeth were bonded using the new primer-incorporated adhesive system (GC Ortho Connect, GC Orthodontics, Breckerfeld, Germany). After bonding, the teeth were stored in artificial saliva at 37

Indexed as

ari scorebondinggc ortho connectshear bond strengthtransbond plus sep

Identifiers

PMID35573492
PMCPMC9098767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.