Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35573450›Full record

ArticlePerspectives in clinical research

Knowledge, attitude, and practice survey on antimicrobial use and resistance among Indian clinicians: A multicentric, cross-sectional study.

Suparna Chatterjee, Avijit Hazra, Raja Chakraverty, Nusrat Shafiq, Ashish Pathak, Niyati Trivedi, Balakrishnan Sadasivam, Ashish Kumar Kakkar, Ratinder Jhaj, Rajni Kaul and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives in clinical research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Assessment of antimicrobial prescribing practice, knowledge, and culture in three teaching hospitals.Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Suparna ChatterjeeDepartment of Pharmacology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Avijit HazraDepartment of Pharmacology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Raja ChakravertyDepartment of Pharmacology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Nusrat ShafiqDepartment of Pharmacology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Ashish PathakDepartment of Paediatrics, R. D. Gardi Medical College, Ujjain, India.
Niyati TrivediDepartment of Pharmacology, Government Medical College, Baroda, Gujarat, India.
Balakrishnan SadasivamDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Science, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Ashish Kumar KakkarDepartment of Pharmacology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Ratinder JhajDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Science, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Rajni KaulIndian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Nilima KshirsagarIndian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This multicentric questionnaire-based study was undertaken to address the lack of systematic background data on the knowledge, attitudes, and practices among Indian physicians related to antimicrobial use and resistance. Materials and Methods: A validated structured study questionnaire was used for capturing respondent particulars, antimicrobial prescribing habits, knowledge of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), ways of choosing and learning about antibiotics, agreement or disagreement with certain perceptions regarding antibiotics, selection of antibiotics in specific settings, and suggestions regarding rationalizing antimicrobial use in the practice setting. Summary statistical analysis of the pooled data was done. Results: Five hundred and six respondents with a mean (standard deviation) age of 31.4 (8.71) years participated in the study. Three hundred and twenty-seven were medical and 179 surgical discipline clinicians. Overall, the theoretical knowledge about antimicrobials was satisfactory, but areas of concern were noted in the attitude and practice domains. A substantial proportion of participants failed to identify the correct choice of antibiotics in the case-based scenarios. 38.33% reported not attending a single continuing medical education on antimicrobials during the past year. Statistically significant differences were not observed in the KAP quotient scores between medical and surgical discipline respondents. Conclusions: Despite satisfactory background knowledge regarding the rational use of antimicrobials and AMR patterns, there are discrepancies in the physicians' prescribing attitude and thus strengthen the case for instituting specific interventions to improve antimicrobial prescribing.

Indexed as

Antibioticsantimicrobial resistanceattitudeIndiaknowledgepracticesurvey

Identifiers

PMID35573450
PMCPMC9106129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.