ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2022
Identifying Associations in Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Values of
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bayesian network models to assess antimicrobial resistance patterns of Streptococcus suis isolated from swine production systems in the United States between 2014-2021.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Diversity ofVeterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Analysis of Antimicrobial Residues and Resistance Profiles ofVeterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Antimicrobial Susceptibility in Respiratory Pathogens and Farm and Animal Variables in Weaned California Dairy Heifers: Logistic Regression and Bayesian Network Analyses.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Phytochemical Composition and Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Activities ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Many antimicrobial resistance (AMR) studies in both human and veterinary medicine use traditional statistical methods that consider one bacteria and one antibiotic match at a time. A more robust analysis of AMR patterns in groups of animals is needed to improve on traditional methods examining antibiotic resistance profiles, the associations between the patterns of resistance or reduced susceptibility for all isolates in an investigation. The use of Bayesian network analysis can identify associations between distributions; this investigation seeks to add to the growing body of AMR pattern research by using Bayesian networks to identify relationships between susceptibility patterns in Methods: A retrospective data analysis was performed using data from rectal swab samples collected from 341 weaned dairy heifers on six farms in California and selectively cultured for Results: The graph identified that as susceptibility to one antibiotic decreases, so does susceptibility to other antibiotics in the same or similar class. The following antibiotics were connected in the final graphical model: ampicillin was connected to ceftiofur; spectinomycin was connected with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and this association was mediated by farm; florfenicol was connected with tetracycline. Conclusions: Bayesian network analysis can elucidate complex relationships between MIC patterns. MIC values may be associated within and between drug classes, and some associations may be correlated with farm of sample origin. Treating MICs as discretized variables and testing for joint associations in trends may overcome common research problems surrounding the lack of clinical breakpoints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.