Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35573388›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2022

Using passive extraction of real-world data from eConsent, electronic patient reported outcomes (ePRO) and electronic health record (EHR) data loaded to an electronic data capture (EDC) system for a multi-center, prospective, observational study in diabetic patients.

Cynthia M Senerchia, Tracy L Ohrt, Peter N Payne, Samantha Cheng, David Wimmer, Irene Margolin-Katz, Devin Tian, Lawrence Garber, Stephanie Abbott, Brian Webster

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cynthia M SenerchiaOptum Insight, Life Sciences, Digital Research Network, 11000 Optum Circle, Eden Prairie, MN, 55344, USA.
Tracy L OhrtOptum Insight, Life Sciences, Digital Research Network, 11000 Optum Circle, Eden Prairie, MN, 55344, USA.
Peter N PayneOptum Insight, Life Sciences, Digital Research Network, 11000 Optum Circle, Eden Prairie, MN, 55344, USA.
Samantha ChengOptum Insight, Life Sciences, Digital Research Network, 11000 Optum Circle, Eden Prairie, MN, 55344, USA.
David WimmerOptum Insight, Life Sciences, Digital Research Network, 11000 Optum Circle, Eden Prairie, MN, 55344, USA.
Irene Margolin-KatzOptum Insight, Life Sciences, Digital Research Network, 11000 Optum Circle, Eden Prairie, MN, 55344, USA.
Devin TianOptum Insight, Life Sciences, Digital Research Network, 11000 Optum Circle, Eden Prairie, MN, 55344, USA.
Lawrence GarberReliant Medical Group, 640 Lincoln Street, Worcester, MA, 01605, USA.
Stephanie AbbottWestern Washington Medical Group, 1728 W, Marine View Drive, Suite 110, Everett, WA, 98201, USA.
Brian WebsterWilmington Health, 1202 Medical Center Drive, Wilmington, NC, 28401, USA.
Optum (United States) · USReliant Medical Group · USWilmington VA Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As clinical trial complexity has increased over the past decade, using electronic methods to simplify recruitment and data management have been investigated. In this study, the Optum Digital Research Network (DRN) has demonstrated the use of electronic source (eSource) data to ease subject identification, recruitment burden, and used data extracted from electronic health records (EHR) to load to an electronic data capture (EDC) system. This study utilized electronic Informed Consent, electronic patient reported outcomes (SF-12) and included three sites using 3 different EHR systems. Patients with type 2 diabetes with an HbA1c ≥ 7.0% treated with metformin monotherapy were recruited. Endpoints consisted of changes in HbA1c, medications, and quality of life measures over 12-weeks of study participation using data from the subjects' eSources listed above. The study began in June of 2020 and the last patient last visit occurred in January of 2021. Forty-eight participants were consented and enrolled. HbA1c was repeated for 33 and ePRO was obtained from all subjects at baseline and 28 at 12-week follow-up. Using eSource data eliminated transcription errors. Medication changes, healthcare encounters and lab results were identified when they occurred in standard clinical practice from the EHR systems. Minimal data transformation and normalization was required. Data for this observational trial where clinical outcomes are available using lab results, diagnoses, and encounters may be achieved via direct access to eSources. This methodology was successful and could be expanded for larger trials and will significantly reduce staff effort and exemplified clinical research as a care option.

Indexed as

AE, Adverse EventDRN, Digital Research NetworkeCRF, Electronic Case Report FormEDC, Electronic Data CaptureEHR, Electronic Health RecordElectronic data captureElectronic health recordElectronic sourceePRO, Electronic Patient Reported OutcomesHbA1c, Hemoglobin A1CHCO, Healthcare OrganizationHIPAA, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability ActICD-10, International Classification of Diseases 10th RevisionIDN, Integrated Delivery NetworkIP, Investigational ProductIQR, Interquartile RangeIRB, Institutional Review BoardPragmatic clinical trialQOL, Quality of LifeReal world dataReal world evidenceRWD, Real World DataRWE, Real World EvidenceSAE, Serious Adverse EventSD, Standard DeviationSDV, Source Data VerficationSF-12, Short Form Health SurveySMS, Optum Smart Measurement SystemT2DM, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Identifiers

PMID35573388
PMCPMC9097692
OpenAlexW4229031613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.