Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35573377›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2022

The Feasibility and Utility of Harnessing Digital Health to Understand Clinical Trajectories in Medication Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder: D-TECT Study Design and Methodological Considerations.

Lisa A Marsch, Ching-Hua Chen, Sara R Adams, Asma Asyyed, Monique B Does, Saeed Hassanpour, Emily Hichborn, Melanie Jackson-Morris, Nicholas C Jacobson, Heather K Jones and 9 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04535583 (Harnessing Digital Health to Understand Clinical Trajectories of Opioid Use Disorder), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04535583 completednot on this map

Harnessing Digital Health to Understand Clinical Trajectories of Opioid Use Disorder

TypeobservationalSponsorDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterRan2020 to 2021Enrolled65ConditionsOpioid-use Disorder
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Overdose Detection Technologies to Reduce Solitary Overdose Deaths: A Literature Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa A MarschCenter for Technology and Behavioral Health, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, United States.
Ching-Hua ChenCenter for Computational Health, International Business Machines (IBM) Research, Yorktown Heights, NY, United States.
Sara R AdamsDivision of Research Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, United States.
Asma AsyyedThe Permanente Medical Group, Northern California, Addiction Medicine and Recovery Services, Oakland, CA, United States.
Monique B DoesDivision of Research Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, United States.
Saeed HassanpourCenter for Technology and Behavioral Health, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, United States.
Emily HichbornCenter for Technology and Behavioral Health, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, United States.
Melanie Jackson-MorrisDivision of Research Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, United States.
Nicholas C JacobsonCenter for Technology and Behavioral Health, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, United States.
Heather K JonesDivision of Research Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, United States.
David KotzCenter for Technology and Behavioral Health, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, United States.
Chantal A Lambert-HarrisCenter for Technology and Behavioral Health, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, United States.
Zhiguo LiCenter for Computational Health, International Business Machines (IBM) Research, Yorktown Heights, NY, United States.
Bethany McLemanCenter for Technology and Behavioral Health, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, United States.
Varun MishraKhoury College of Computer Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States.
Catherine StangerCenter for Technology and Behavioral Health, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, United States.
Geetha SubramaniamCenter for Clinical Trials Network, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Weiyi WuCenter for Technology and Behavioral Health, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, United States.
Cynthia I CampbellDivision of Research Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, United States.
Dartmouth College · USKaiser Permanente · USIBM (United States) · USNational Institute on Drug Abuse · USNortheastern University · US

Funding

Project-002UG1DA040309 · NIDA · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Lisa A. Marsch · 2015 to 2026
$37.9M
Treatment Development & Evaluation CoreP30DA029926 · NIDA · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Lisa A. Marsch · 2011 to 2026
$21.5M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Across the U.S., the prevalence of opioid use disorder (OUD) and the rates of opioid overdoses have risen precipitously in recent years. Several effective medications for OUD (MOUD) exist and have been shown to be life-saving. A large volume of research has identified a confluence of factors that predict attrition and continued substance use during substance use disorder treatment. However, much of this literature has examined a small set of potential moderators or mediators of outcomes in MOUD treatment and may lead to over-simplified accounts of treatment non-adherence. Digital health methodologies offer great promise for capturing intensive, longitudinal ecologically-valid data from individuals in MOUD treatment to extend our understanding of factors that impact treatment engagement and outcomes. Methods: This paper describes the protocol (including the study design and methodological considerations) from a novel study supported by the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network at the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). This study (D-TECT) primarily seeks to evaluate the feasibility of collecting ecological momentary assessment (EMA), smartphone and smartwatch sensor data, and social media data among patients in outpatient MOUD treatment. It secondarily seeks to examine the utility of EMA, digital sensing, and social media data (separately and compared to one another) in predicting MOUD treatment retention, opioid use events, and medication adherence [as captured in electronic health records (EHR) and EMA data]. To our knowledge, this is the first project to include all three sources of digitally derived data (EMA, digital sensing, and social media) in understanding the clinical trajectories of patients in MOUD treatment. These multiple data streams will allow us to understand the relative and combined utility of collecting digital data from these diverse data sources. The inclusion of EHR data allows us to focus on the utility of digital health data in predicting objectively measured clinical outcomes. Discussion: Results may be useful in elucidating novel relations between digital data sources and OUD treatment outcomes. It may also inform approaches to enhancing outcomes measurement in clinical trials by allowing for the assessment of dynamic interactions between individuals' daily lives and their MOUD treatment response. Clinical Trial Registration: Identifier: NCT04535583.

Indexed as

digital phenotypingecological momentary assessment (EMA)medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD)opioid use disorder (OUD)passive sensingsocial media

Identifiers

PMID35573377
PMCPMC9098973
OpenAlexW4225164540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.