Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35573324›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychiatry2022

A Systematic Review on the Effects of Different Types of Probiotics in Animal Alzheimer's Disease Studies.

Tanja J de Rijke, M H Edwina Doting, Saskia van Hemert, Peter P De Deyn, Barbara C van Munster, Hermie J M Harmsen, Iris E C Sommer

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Psychobiotic Properties ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tanja J de RijkeDepartment of Biomedical Sciences of Cells and Systems, University Medical Center Groningen/University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
M H Edwina DotingDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University Medical Center Groningen/University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Saskia van HemertWinclove Probiotics, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Peter P De DeynAlzheimer Center Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Barbara C van MunsterAlzheimer Center Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Hermie J M HarmsenDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University Medical Center Groningen/University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Iris E C SommerDepartment of Biomedical Sciences of Cells and Systems, University Medical Center Groningen/University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
University Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Groningen · NLWinclove Probiotics (Netherlands) · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a global public health priority as with aging populations, its prevalence is expected to rise even further in the future. The brain and gut are in close communication through immunological, nervous and hormonal routes, and therefore, probiotics are examined as an option to influence AD hallmarks, such as plaques, tangles, and low grade inflammation. This study aimed to provide an overview of the available animal evidence on the effect of different probiotics on gut microbiota composition, short chain fatty acids (SCFAs), inflammatory markers, Amyloid-β (Aβ), and cognitive functioning in AD animal models. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, SCOPUS, and APA PsychInfo. Articles were included up to May 2021. Inclusion criteria included a controlled animal study on probiotic supplementation and at least one of the abovementioned outcome variables. Of the eighteen studies, most were conducted in AD male mice models (

Indexed as

amyloid-betaBifidobacterium longumClostridium butyricumcognitive functioninggut microbiota compositioninflammatory markersmicrobiota-gut-brain axisshort chain fatty acids

Identifiers

PMID35573324
PMCPMC9094066
OpenAlexW4224925081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.