ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022
EEG-TNet: An End-To-End Brain Computer Interface Framework for Mental Workload Estimation.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Human-Centric Cognitive State Recognition Using Physiological Signals: A Systematic Review of Machine Learning Strategies Across Application Domains.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Pooled it
- Machine learning performance in EEG-based mental workload classification across task types: a systematic review.Frontiers in neuroergonomics · 2025Pooled it
- Rapid Mental Workload Detection of Air Traffic Controllers with Three EEG Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Survey on the research direction of EEG-based signal processing.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Review
- The Application of Electroencephalogram in Driving Safety: Current Status and Future Prospects.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Review
- Influencing factors and mechanism of high-speed railway passenger overall comfort: Insights from source functional brain network and subjective report.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The mental workload (MWL) of different occupational groups' workers is the main and direct factor of unsafe behavior, which may cause serious accidents. One of the new and useful technologies to estimate MWL is the Brain computer interface (BCI) based on EEG signals, which is regarded as the gold standard of cognitive status. However, estimation systems involving handcrafted EEG features are time-consuming and unsuitable to apply in real-time. The purpose of this study was to propose an end-to-end BCI framework for MWL estimation. First, a new automated data preprocessing method was proposed to remove the artifact without human interference. Then a new neural network structure named EEG-TNet was designed to extract both the temporal and frequency information from the original EEG. Furthermore, two types of experiments and ablation studies were performed to prove the effectiveness of this model. In the subject-dependent experiment, the estimation accuracy of dual-task estimation (No task vs. TASK) and triple-task estimation (Lo vs. Mi vs. Hi) reached 99.82 and 99.21%, respectively. In contrast, the accuracy of different tasks reached 82.78 and 66.83% in subject-independent experiments. Additionally, the ablation studies proved that preprocessing method and network structure had significant contributions to estimation MWL. The proposed method is convenient without any human intervention and outperforms other related studies, which becomes an effective way to reduce human factor risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.