ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022
Estimating High-Order Brain Functional Networks in Bayesian View for Autism Spectrum Disorder Identification.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The neurobiology of functional neurological disorders characterised by impaired awareness.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain functional network (BFN) has become an increasingly important tool to understand the inherent organization of the brain and explore informative biomarkers of neurological disorders. Pearson's correlation (PC) is the most widely accepted method for constructing BFNs and provides a basis for designing new BFN estimation schemes. Particularly, a recent study proposes to use two sequential PC operations, namely, correlation's correlation (CC), for constructing the high-order BFN. Despite its empirical effectiveness in identifying neurological disorders and detecting subtle changes of connections in different subject groups, CC is defined intuitively without a solid and sustainable theoretical foundation. For understanding CC more rigorously and providing a systematic BFN learning framework, in this paper, we reformulate it in the Bayesian view with a prior of matrix-variate normal distribution. As a result, we obtain a probabilistic explanation of CC. In addition, we develop a Bayesian high-order method (BHM) to automatically and simultaneously estimate the high- and low-order BFN based on the probabilistic framework. An efficient optimization algorithm is also proposed. Finally, we evaluate BHM in identifying subjects with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) from typical controls based on the estimated BFNs. Experimental results suggest that the automatically learned high- and low-order BFNs yield a superior performance over the artificially defined BFNs
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.