Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35573307›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022

Enhanced Nerve Regeneration by Bionic Conductive Nerve Scaffold Under Electrical Stimulation.

Zhenhui Liu, Yanshi Liu, Maimaiaili Yushan, Aihemaitijiang Yusufu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Targeted muscle reinnervation for treatment of painful stump neuroma].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. The interaction between oxidative stress and Schwann cells.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhenhui LiuDepartment of Orthopedics, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Yanshi LiuDepartment of Trauma and Micro Reconstructive Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Maimaiaili YushanDepartment of Trauma and Micro Reconstructive Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Aihemaitijiang YusufuDepartment of Trauma and Micro Reconstructive Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University · CNXinjiang Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Repair of peripheral nerve defect (PND) with a poor prognosis is hard to deal with. Neural conduit applied to nerve defect at present could not achieve the effect of autologous nerve transplantation. We prepared bionic conductive neural scaffolds to provide a new strategy for the treatment of PNDs. The highly aligned poly (L-lactic acid) (PLLA) fiber mats and the multi-microchannel conductive scaffolds were combined into bionic conductive nerve scaffolds, which were implanted into rats with sciatic nerve defects. The experimental animals were divided into the scaffold group (S), scaffold with electrical stimulation (ES) group (S&E), and autologous nerve transplantation group (AT). The regenerative effect of bionic conductive nerve scaffolds was analyzed. Compared with aligned PLLA fiber mats (APFMs), highly aligned fiber mats had a higher fiber orientation and did not change the tensile strength, Young's modulus, degradation rate, elongation at break of the fiber membrane, and biocompatibility. The bionic conductive nerve scaffolds were well matched with the rat sciatic nerve. The evaluations of the sciatic nerve in Group S&E were close to those in Group AT and better than those in Group S. Immunohistochemical results showed that the expression levels of neurofilament heavy polypeptide (NF-H) and protein S100-B (S100-β) in Group S&E were higher than those in Group S, and the expression levels of low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 (LRP4), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) p38, extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) in Group AT were higher than those in Group S. Bionic conductive nerve scaffolds combined with ES could enhance peripheral nerve regeneration and achieve satisfactory nerve regeneration close to autologous nerve grafts. ERK, p38 MAPK, MEK, and LRP4 may be involved in peripheral nerve regeneration under ES.

Indexed as

bionic conductive nerve scaffoldelectrical stimulationnerve regenerationnerve repairPLLA fibrous mats

Identifiers

PMID35573307
PMCPMC9091912
OpenAlexW4224939094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.