Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35573178›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2022

Contrasting patterns from two invasion fronts suggest a niche shift of an invasive predator of native bees.

Maria João Verdasca, Luisa Carvalheiro, Jesus Aguirre Gutierrez, José Pedro Granadeiro, Quentin Rome, Sebastien J Puechmaille, Rui Rebelo, Hugo Rebelo

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. On the Evidence of the European Bee-Eater (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maria João VerdascacE3c - Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes, Faculty of Sciences of Lisbon University, Lisboa, Portugal.
Luisa CarvalheirocE3c - Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes, Faculty of Sciences of Lisbon University, Lisboa, Portugal.
Jesus Aguirre GutierrezSchool of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Environmental Change Institute, Oxford, UK.
José Pedro GranadeiroCentre for Environmental and Marine Studies (CESAM) - Departamento de Biologia Animal, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Quentin RomeUMS 2006 PatriNat -OFB, CNRS, MNHN, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France.
Sebastien J PuechmailleZoological Institute and Museum, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Rui RebelocE3c - Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes, Faculty of Sciences of Lisbon University, Lisboa, Portugal.
Hugo RebeloUniversity of Porto, CIBIO/InBIO, Porto, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The accuracy of predictions of invasive species ranges is dependent on niche similarity between invasive and native populations and on our ability to identify the niche characteristics. With this work we aimed to compare the niche dynamics of two genetically related invasive populations of Methods: Niche dynamics and shifts of Results: An apparent niche shift was detected in the population of the NW of Iberian Peninsula, where the species is living under environmental conditions different from the native niche. In central Europe, large suitable areas remain unoccupied. The fact that both invasive populations are well established, despite occupying environmentally distinct regions indicates that

Indexed as

EcosystemWaspsAnimalsBeesEuropeEurope, EasternIntroduced SpeciesInvasive speciesNiche dynamicsRealized nicheReciprocal distribution modelsVespa velutina

Identifiers

PMID35573178
PMCPMC9104094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.