Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35573089›Full record

ArticleJournal of business ethics : JBE2023

A Network Approach to Compliance: A Complexity Science Understanding of How Rules Shape Behavior.

Malouke Esra Kuiper, Monique Chambon, Anne Leonore de Bruijn, Chris Reinders Folmer, Elke Hindina Olthuis, Megan Brownlee, Emmeke Barbara Kooistra, Adam Fine, Frenk van Harreveld, Gabriela Lunansky and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of business ethics : JBE, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The relationship between public law-abiding tendency and safe COVID-19 behaviors, development of a new scale, and association with health-related behaviors.Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Malouke Esra KuiperSchool of Law, University of Amsterdam, Roetersstraat 11, 1018 WB Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1827-7126
Monique ChambonDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 129-B, 1018 WS Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anne Leonore de BruijnSchool of Law, University of Amsterdam, Roetersstraat 11, 1018 WB Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Chris Reinders FolmerSchool of Law, University of Amsterdam, Roetersstraat 11, 1018 WB Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Elke Hindina OlthuisSchool of Law, University of Amsterdam, Roetersstraat 11, 1018 WB Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Megan BrownleeSchool of Law, University of Amsterdam, Roetersstraat 11, 1018 WB Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Emmeke Barbara KooistraSchool of Law, University of Amsterdam, Roetersstraat 11, 1018 WB Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Adam FineSchool of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Arizona State University, University Center, 411 N Central Ave, #600, Phoenix, USA.
Frenk van HarreveldDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 129-B, 1018 WS Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gabriela LunanskySchool of Law, University of Amsterdam, Roetersstraat 11, 1018 WB Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Benjamin van RooijSchool of Law, University of Amsterdam, Roetersstraat 11, 1018 WB Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To understand how compliance develops both in everyday and corporate environments, it is crucial to understand how different mechanisms work together to shape individuals' (non)compliant behavior. Existing compliance studies typically focus on a subset of theories (i.e., rational choice theories, social theories, legitimacy theories, capacity theories, and opportunity theories) to understand how key variables from one or several of these theories shape individual compliance. The present study provides a first integrated understanding of compliance, rooted in complexity science, in which key elements from these theories are considered simultaneously, and their relations to compliance and each other are explored using network analysis. This approach is developed by analyzing online survey data ( Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10551-022-05128-8.

Indexed as

Complexity scienceComplianceNetwork analysis

Identifiers

PMID35573089
PMCPMC9089293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.