Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35573082›Full record

ArticleUrban water journal2021

Leveraging ancillary benefits from urban greenspace - a case study of St. Louis, Missouri.

Page Jordan, Fushcia-Ann Hoover, Matthew E Hopton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urban water journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Page JordanU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Solutions and Emergency Response, Water Infrastructure Division, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3861-5014
Fushcia-Ann HooverNational Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center, University of Maryland, Annapolis, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9067-0504
Matthew E HoptonU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Solutions and Emergency Response, Water Infrastructure Division, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7962-6820

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urban greenspace and green infrastructure are often cited for their many ecosystem services and benefits including stormwater management. However, the localized nature and limited range of effects of these benefits and the type of greenspace and green infrastructure, make planning and placement critical components to selecting for and maximizing desired benefits. Here, the authors test a framework to demonstrate a practical approach to simultaneously manage excess stormwater and maximize distribution of ecosystem services to underserved areas using spatial analysis. St. Louis was subdivided using census block polygons and polygons identified have combined sewer systems with high aggregate annual discharge. Additionally, indicators representing social, economic, and environmental characteristics, which have demonstrated effects from greenspace, were mapped to identify spatial distribution and overlap. The analysis identified one polygon that could promote multiple desired ecosystem services, while reducing annual discharge into combined sewers, and provide these services to an underserved demographic.

Indexed as

Ecosystem servicesequitygreen infrastructuregreenspacestormwater managementurban planning

Identifiers

PMID35573082
PMCPMC9104785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.